Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL
We are discussing his qualifications in infectious diseases, specifically with respect to whether vaccines are safe and/or beneficial, and you quote a web rating based on 8 anonymous web posters, which is based on things like ease of making an appointment, and courteous staff? Seriously? How does that even relate? Critical thinking?
|
I was really tired and should've quit before I posted that lame rating system on him.
OK, back to critical thinking...I had a chance to go back to Science-Based Medicine and look over the info.
This is the part where I suspect you and I will never be able to agree. The name of the site says it all...it's Science-Based...and who better to quote to support science: CDC and WHO
I will NEVER trust these organizations. There's a vested interest...CDC and WHO serve it up...the Problem...Govt's react...we have a problem and must do something or else and big pharma steps in....with a solution and the cycle goes on and on and on.
The other thing I will never trust...numbers and the quality of such information. Look at govt stats...multi-layered deceptions to serve their interest.
So, trash in, trash out.
As for the Dr. that wrote that piece...I think he has good intentions. I don't think he's trying to hurt anyone...most of us aren't...we're just so compartmentalized and will find ways to justify what we're doing as being the correct course of action. Maybe it is...maybe it isn't. In most cases on an individual basis, we're trying to be good people. Unfortunately, good people can get sucked into a corrupt system and not fully understand "the business model".
I do think though, that at some point in our lives, we are faced with the truth about what we're doing and if we're playing for the right team or not.