View Single Post
  #25  
Old 12-06-2012, 10:38 PM
Roadkill's Avatar
Roadkill Roadkill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 892
Roadkill is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayerische E53 View Post
As I said, I don't care too much about power. Unless you're going off-road (whether in the woods or racing), it is my opinion that big power is really unnecessary. Look at the big AMG MLs and the X5/6 M/// - who needs that kind of power to cart the kids/wife/groceries around? Plus, you need special equipment and a degree in nuclear engineering to do anything more complex than a god damned oil change. It's not my thing. As I said before, TO ME, simplicity is more important than power. Not hating on anyone with the "big" cars (except the people who buy them for the simple fact of saying "look how much power I have." Lame and unimpressive.) ... it's just not my cup of tea.



Very good post. This is all true.




I agree with everything you just posted. It's the consumer rather than the car companies that is sending traditional things to the way side. I mean, let's get real here - the new BMWs have the ability to "tweet" from the iDrive. Get fuckin' real, will ya? Look at BMW's current customer-base majority - it's comprised mainly of the new generation of kids and soccer moms with nothing to do but gossip on facebook and twitter. What do you think BMW is going to do? They gotta out-sell Audi!

Seriously, I'm still trying to find the importance and need of a 500hp, 5,000lbs luxury SUV. Even more difficult to find is the importance of a transmission that allows that very SUV to shift in 150 miliseconds. The consumer loves saying "I laugh at your car...my SUV does 0-60 in 4.2 seconds - with a standard manual it would only do it in 4.5 seconds!" Again, I respectfully state the following rhetorical statement/question: "Get fuckin' real, will ya?"

People love showing off how tech-savvy they are, how cutting-edge they are, how cool their "stuff" is, how powerful their engines are, and how fast their transmissions are. In my opinion, these types of people are on the cutting-edge of showing off and fucking about ... that's all.

Yeah, I'm an old fart - so?

Again, not hating on the "big" cars. The X5M, for instance, is a stellar truck. It's just too much bling-bling and complexity for me.



Depends. Manual 3.0s were rated at 6,000lbs. I also believe that the Facelift autos got bumped up to 6,000lbs as well. You are correct, however, that the pre-facelift 3.0s were rated at 5,000lbs. Never the less, I towed my 5,000+lbs trailer with my pre-facelift 3.0 without incident over the course of 15,000 miles or so. The weight limitation on these cars is underrated.
It appears that BMW is not the car for you anymore. I am the individual that enjoys a lot of power and is not interested in fuel economy. I know that a 5000lbs SUV isn't going to handle like an M3. I've got 2 kids and don't feel the need to try and race the STI crowd. You need to tone down your language in your posts and realize that we all have opinions about what these cars are about. We're all different and that's what I like about this site. It's cool if you think your 3 liter 6 MT is the best out there, I respectfully disagree.
__________________
2006 4.8iS Black/Black with custom Audison Voce/Image Dynamics sound
Production Date - 10/05
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links