JCL
I can appreciate your point and all the comments and your right about the thread title. However I don't think the argument gets polarized by bringing
in gun elimination. I set the stage by saying "Nothing will change because men don't have the guts to do what's necessary to stop the carnage". In my view
the answer is clear if a person doesn't have a gun he can't shoot anyone. I am not alone in that view. Many of my friends feel the same way.
I respect everyones right to state their position but if it is felt that my opinion polarizes the argument. I'm happy to abstain from further comment.
Thanks for the feedback
BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL
It seems to me that the argument gets polarized with words like banned. The question was gun control, not gun elimination.
|
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….