Quote:
Originally Posted by blktoptrvl
Yes, IMO, you make too many assumptions and don't take the time to think about anything or make coherent and apropos points.
What makes you think I am in anyway in favor of big government? Was it because I listed points that I would take to deal with the gun issue? Did you forget that I made those points - not because I believe in big G, but because you ASKED me what my ideas for curbing gun violence were? Don't you understand what ideas "off the top of the head" mean, or have you never been required in your life to THINK about things and make suggestions?
Does expanding one segment of rules mean that we can't contract others? BTW, what is it you want ? Cities with 5 million people in them and no rules? How long do you think that society will last? Or is it just that we need to have only the rules that you favor?
And what about anything I have posted is in contradiction to my sig? To what was I referring when I wrote that sig? What is it's context? What is it's meaning? How does wanting to regulate and tax and keeping weapons out of the hands of nutjobs contradict with my sig? You haven't a clue have you?
Like so many things that you don't know you just fill in the blanks with whatever is floating in your head and start arguing from your own imaginary points, not about anything that was actually said.
It seemed to me that Piers was having a reasonable discussion - as I said - minus the name calling. The other guy just rants without any point other than "I want." "I want." "I want." With no other substance - you do remember that my comment was about the videos and not about the constitution - or are you too deep into your own talking points?
You know when I think about all the people in this world who definitely should not have a gun, you certainly jump to the top of the list now. I believe there should be some standard of ability to reason and debate without straying from facts and reality in order to own a gun. Seems to me you fail when it come to that test.
|
I will say this...as this is MY THREAD...and was ORIGINALLY about Gerald Celente and not Alex Jones...the only reason I find your thoughts contradictory is because you are limiting peoples RIGHTS with your thoughts about creating limitations on gun ownership. I find you to be quite judgmental for someone that wants to protect "Rights" above all else...not even trade them for "magic beans"
Again, no mention of real issues facing citizens of the USA...gangs, abortions, pharmaceuticals, suicide, knives, hammers, clubs, etc. It's just guns...I just find it odd that it's just guns that outrage you to the point that you're looking to pick a fight on a thread that wasn't even about GUNS.
And, I'm the one with the problem?
Why did you decide to post your diatribe on this thread??? Why not the one that was about "Gun Control"? Seems odd to me. Well, maybe not if I'm correct that you're looking for a fight and needed to throw your ad hominems directly at me. What did I piss you off in another thread? Did I somehow make you feel insecure about yourself? Again, why this thread?
I think it's pretty clear that you are not from the REPUBLIC
You must have some other form of tyranny that you're concerned about. Your signature doesn't jive with what a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC would stand for with regards to protecting peoples "Rights". I ASSUMED that you might have been a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC...that's obviously NOT the case.
You're the person from "various"
But seriously, best wishes in your life and may you and your loved ones be kept safe from harm...and I'm not being sarcastic. In the end, most of us are just humans that were made in Gods image trying to figure out what all this means and how to protect our loved ones from tyrannical/evil forces that would prefer to enslave us.
Now, go ahead and tell me what a bad person I am and how I shouldn't own a gun.