View Single Post
  #23  
Old 01-12-2013, 07:21 AM
Isambard's Avatar
Isambard Isambard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Was UK, now Aus
Posts: 562
Isambard is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL View Post
You are taking your single example and claiming it is indicative of a much larger population of transmissions. That is not sound logic.
No I'm not. I'm doing nothing of the sort. I am simply reporting on MY findings and experiences to date on MY transmission pre and post fluid change. And as such, as stated previously if it goes bang then you'll all be the first to hear.


What claims have I made concerning anyone else's transmission?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL View Post
You used a non-recommended fluid and had no problems. Great. Congratulations. But statistically, others would be better served by using recommended fluids. There are lots of trusted statistics and professional experiences related to increased rates of ZF failures after using incorrect fluids. Those statistics have no relation to an individual's personal preferences.
Yes I used a 'non-recommended fluid', I've also been caught for speeding once or twice. So what?

Where can I find these 'trusted statistics' and 'professional experiences' that relate to my specific transmission coupled with my specific symptoms prior to the fluid change? Has a qualified individual, or a company/third party run controlled tests on this transmission using different fluids and as a result there is a load of data on it somewhere I don't know about? Or is it simply peoples opinions popping up again?

'But statistically, others would be better served by using recommended fluids' Where you have sourced those statistics from?
__________________
Present:
01 X5 4.4i
07 Yam R1

Past:
89 R32 Skyline various mods, running 442 BHP
00 Merc CLK55 AMG
01 E39 M5 Haywood and Scott silencers
02 E46 M3 Supersprint Cats, Eibach Lowered, Thorney Motorsport Remap, running 368 BHP
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links