|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are killing me man, you really don't understand what happened? Take to different diameter glasses/cups/whatever is round, put a mark at the edge, lay it down on the side with mark up. Roll each 5 times and you will see that object with bigger diameter went further. Now, think about this: power comes out of transmission in to differential, and it equally gives both driveshafts 5 rotations (for example) the axcel with 275/40 would obviously try to travel longer distance then axcel with 315/35, the differential ate up that difference up until it destroyed itself.
__________________
2009 Range Rover Sport SC HST Limited Edition 2014 Infiniti Q50 AWD |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
03 3.0i mt 89 325is |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
thanks....that is a good way to explain what a significant variance in rolling diameter can do....but i think you are confusing aspect ratio with diameter....as joshdub pointed out their rolling diameter is almost same i confirmed with this calculator Tire Size Calculator - Tire & Wheel Plus Sizing Last edited by kashmir; 09-25-2015 at 09:22 PM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
well, I guess you know better. There is always a possibility that it was simply time for that differential to become broken
![]() But I am having hard time accepting that 275/40 has the same diameter as 315/35. The length of the circle is 2PiR Where We have 275x40, 40mm (4 centimeters) height of the tire which we will add to the diameter of a rim on both sides.... 4+50.8(diameter of the rim)+4= 58.8, where radius would be precisely half, 2 x 3.14 x 29.4 = 184.73 Where we have 315x35... (3.5 centimeters) 3.5+50.8+3.5=181.58 According to that wheel with tire that has a wall height of 40mm will have 184.73cm outer length and the one with 35mm wall height will have 181.58 cm outer length which is not the same. Am I overthinking the situation?
__________________
2009 Range Rover Sport SC HST Limited Edition 2014 Infiniti Q50 AWD |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
It wouldnt take 25k to break it if it were caused by the wrong diameter tires. Also, those sizes, assuming the same brand, are only 2 hundredths of an inch different in diameter which is nothing in this case.
__________________
02 e53 X5 3.0i Manual Trans 13 e70 X5 xDrive35i 04 Honda S2000 |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roman, you are having problems comprehending because you have it wrong in your head. the second number is not millimeters, but instead a percentage of the first number. The sidewalls on the 275/40s are 110 mm tall and the sidewalls on the 315/35s are 110.25 mm tall.
__________________
02 e53 X5 3.0i Manual Trans 13 e70 X5 xDrive35i 04 Honda S2000 |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kashmir,
Yes those were oem size setup on the 4.8is e53. What about your diff broke ? As for 8 hrs, given the have to drop the subframe to remove the diff, front axles, and the bolts are hard to reach that doesn't sound too bad. J
__________________
2003 E39 530i 1992 MX5 2005 E53 x5 4.8is (sold) 1990 K75S (sold) |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
You need to check your math again. His tires/wheels are the same height between front and rear. Plus as was stated this is a factory sized spec'd tire set. He did not mess up his diff with these tires.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Sidewall Aspect Ratio Typically following the three digits identifying the tire's Section Width in millimeters is a two-digit number that identifies the tire's profile or aspect ratio. P225/50R16 91S The 50 indicates that this tire size's sidewall height (from rim to tread) is 50% of its section width. The measurement is the tire's section height, and also referred to as the tire's series, profile or aspect ratio. The higher the number, the taller the sidewall; the lower the number, the lower the sidewall. We know that this tire size's section width is 225mm and that its section height is 50% of 225mm. By converting the 225mm to inches (225 / 25.4 = 8.86") and multiplying it by 50% (.50) we confirm that this tire size results in a tire section height of 4.43". If this tire were a P225/70R16 size, our calculation would confirm that the size would result in a section height of 6.20", approximately a 1.8-inch taller sidewall.
__________________
2006 Infiniti G35 2001 BMW 3.0I E53 X5 Build date 08/2000 SOLD Lotus Europa 1970 Destroyed by fire Lotus Europa 1970 S2 Renault Powered Lotus Type 52 1970 Twincam Webers Powered PORSCHE 911 Targa 1982 The Garage Queen Audi Avant donated to Kars for Kids BMW 525IT Sold Audi 4000CS Quattro Sold Jensen Healey Lotus Powered Sold Opel 1900 Sold Triumph Spitfire 1971 Sold Triumph Spitfire 1968 Sold Plymouth "Cuda" 340 Six pack SOLD |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|