|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting find
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are you getting the E38 fan because that's what was in there? Would the original 4.6is 9 blade be a downgrade I guess is what I'm asking?
__________________
2005 X5 4.4i Build 04/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, Pano, Sport (Purchased 06/14 w/ 109,000 miles) (Sold 8/15 w/121,000 miles) 2006 X5 4.8is Build 11/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, DSP, Pano, Running Boards, OEM Tow Hitch, Cold Weather Pckg (Purchased 08/15 w/ 90,500 miles) 2010 X5 35d Build 02/10 Nav, HiFi, 6 DVD, Sports Pckg, Cold Weather Pckg, HUD, CAS, Running Boards, Leather Dash, PDC, Pano (Purchased 03/17 w/ 136,120 miles) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes somewhere during previous ownership the fan blade and clutch fan was changed out. The original fan is 9 blade but the 750il one is 11 blade and carries a different clutch fan than the 9 blade fan. I do believe the 11 blade is an upgrade over the 9 blade. Of course I have no conclusive evidence to support this aside from just tell you it works really well. 11 blades of cooling as opposed to 9 blades I think most can get the picture.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It would be an interesting experiment if you would test that. Run the 4.6is one for a week monitoring engine temps (OBD2 or perhaps unlocked cluster) and then swap for the 7 series clutch and fan to see if there are any changes.
I thought the thermostats did more of the fine tuning of the engine temp on these and so was curious if the temps would change or not.
__________________
2005 X5 4.4i Build 04/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, Pano, Sport (Purchased 06/14 w/ 109,000 miles) (Sold 8/15 w/121,000 miles) 2006 X5 4.8is Build 11/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, DSP, Pano, Running Boards, OEM Tow Hitch, Cold Weather Pckg (Purchased 08/15 w/ 90,500 miles) 2010 X5 35d Build 02/10 Nav, HiFi, 6 DVD, Sports Pckg, Cold Weather Pckg, HUD, CAS, Running Boards, Leather Dash, PDC, Pano (Purchased 03/17 w/ 136,120 miles) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good info and I certainly agree that it seems to be an upgrade that, at the VERY least, will help to extend the life of the Efan.
I suggested because for some reason I thought you had ordered the complete assembly, 4.6is clutch AND fan blade (don't know why I thought this)... not just the clutch. I thought you had the stuff on hand for the "experiment." Knowing you don't, I'd do the same as you and just throw what has been working back on there.
__________________
2005 X5 4.4i Build 04/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, Pano, Sport (Purchased 06/14 w/ 109,000 miles) (Sold 8/15 w/121,000 miles) 2006 X5 4.8is Build 11/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, DSP, Pano, Running Boards, OEM Tow Hitch, Cold Weather Pckg (Purchased 08/15 w/ 90,500 miles) 2010 X5 35d Build 02/10 Nav, HiFi, 6 DVD, Sports Pckg, Cold Weather Pckg, HUD, CAS, Running Boards, Leather Dash, PDC, Pano (Purchased 03/17 w/ 136,120 miles) |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the total fan blade surface area is the greater on the 11 blade, and the blade pitch is the same as the 9 blade fan, than the 750 model has greater airflow capability. The next variable would be the fan clutch engagement characteristics.
I would think the 750 sedan has a more restricted airflow through the radiator and engine compartment than the E53 and would call for a fan capable of overcoming that additional resistance. On the E53, the 750 fan should provide a quicker heat transfer under high engine load conditions. 2002 X5 3.0 313,500 miles 2014 428i 23,600 miles 2004 2004 325i sold at 123,600 miles 2001 2001 325i sold at 66,000 miles 1970 Firebird Under restoration |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|