|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
>2004 3.0 6spd owners:
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bump for a good question. Curious myself. These seem to be rarer than the 5 speeds.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have a 2006 model special ordered will on Germany, I will answer after work. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I also have the old 5 Speed manual...rpms are murder,
at speed; see pic attached, below. From memory, the X5 6 speeds have a 6th gear ratio of .83, ("overdriven), vs. the fifth gear ratio of 1.00 in our 5 speeds...the 6 speed vs. the 5 speed has the identical gear ratios except for that OD 6th gear. Some mental arithmetic suggests a 6 speed man.trans should be 700+ less RPMs at cruise speed, imo. BMW doesn't care about manual transmissions in Xs, esp. X5s, (witness no more manuals in E70), and they could have fiddled with the ratios in the 6 speed or, at least given it a seriousazz OD top gear, imo. Some poster here has got to have a real world "80 mph" cruise RPM report, but I'd guess it's ~700+ RPMs less than our 5 speeds. Maybe in the X6... BR,mD Edit: that old pic is of us criusing at "85" with the corresponding high rpms; the real point is that "85" is not really 85, due to the optimistic speedos: thus, ~80 mph = 4,000 RPMs in the 5 spd manual. Ugghhhh... http://www.xoutpost.com/attachments/l...g?d=1113337366
__________________
Ol'UncleMotor From the Home Base of Pro Bono Punditry and 50 Cent Opins... Our Mtn Scenes, Car Pics, and Road Trip Pics on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627297418250/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627332480833/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/45275375@N00/ My X Page ![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
That math makes sense, and is a pity. IIRC my 5 speed manual at 70mph unladen is somewhere just north of 3000rpm. Horriffic.
Having said that, I would still entertain swapping to the 6 just for those 700rpm.
__________________
2001 E53 3.0 5pd |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone?
700rpm less sounds too optimistic
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a 04 x5 with 6 speed. In 6th gear at 65 mph slightly over 2500 rpm and 3300 rpm at 85 mph.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Memphis,Tn Posts: 5 I have a 04 x5 with 6 speed. In 6th gear at 65 mph slightly over 2500 rpm and 3300 rpm at 85 mph. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pretty good math. I checked my x yesterday.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have the 06 manual and also put 295/45/20's on it to decrease the RPM's even more. I'm sure my speedometer is off a little but I'm accumulating fewer miles on the odometer too. My mpg average over the entire 34,100 miles is 21.6 mpg accoding to the computer. It's actually higher than that becasue the computer hasn't compensated for the more miles actually driven becasue of the larger diameter tires. I'm on the road for Air Force duty this week and will check the RPM's once I get back to the airport.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming: "WOW! WHAT A RIDE!!" 2007 M6 2018 Chevy 2500HD Diesel Alaskan Edition 2011 X5 35d 1972 Chevy K20 4X4 1972 Ford F-600 1959 Chevy Viking 60 Dump Truck 2015 CanAm Outlander XT 1000 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|