Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E53) Forum
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:15 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 82
woodranch is on a distinguished road
2003 4.6is vs Range Rover Sport supercharged

Which is faster in 0 to 60 the 2003 4.6is or the Range Rover Sport Supercharged.Any thoughts on the RangeRover in comparison to the 4.6 in all other areas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:30 PM
kevnmurphy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: From the Bay, Live in Portland
Posts: 143
kevnmurphy is on a distinguished road
I think the Range is a little faster, but I don't think they hold their value over time (like 5+years) as well as a 4.6 or 4.8 would. If you look on the road, you don't see many RR 4.6HSE models (1996 - 2002). I think RR has really lost their touch with reliability over the last decade. They are very luxurious, and great looking, but I just don't think they go off road like they used to, or hold up over time. From what I have heard, they kind of hit the wall at 60,000 miles.
In the overall comparison, I would think the 4.6is would be better in most.
__________________
Eazy wit da Haaahdwaire!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:14 AM
X5audi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 591
X5audi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevnmurphy
I think the Range is a little faster, but I don't think they hold their value over time (like 5+years) as well as a 4.6 or 4.8 would. If you look on the road, you don't see many RR 4.6HSE models (1996 - 2002). I think RR has really lost their touch with reliability over the last decade. They are very luxurious, and great looking, but I just don't think they go off road like they used to, or hold up over time. From what I have heard, they kind of hit the wall at 60,000 miles.
In the overall comparison, I would think the 4.6is would be better in most.
Sorry, but I simply must correct you.

The Range Rover Sport Supercharged is no quicker than a Toyota Highlander V6. The X5 4.6is was over a second quicker while it was still on sale.

The Range Rover has never been reliable. But it's still the best high-end off-roader money can buy in the US.
__________________
'08 BMW X5 4.8i *'06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG *'05 Audi S4 Cabriolet

Vote Sprint Blue for a greater America
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 01:17 AM
X5audi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 591
X5audi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by X5audi
The Range Rover Sport Supercharged is no quicker than a Toyota Highlander V6. The X5 4.6is was over a second quicker while it was still on sale.
Oh, I just realized something! The RRS-S suffers from curb weight syndrome. It is a disease found mostly in SUVs such as this, or the Cayenne. Its effects include aggressively-tuned exhaust notes that make it sound and feel like you're going fast... but in reality, you just can't pass that 525i next to you.

Curiously, although the X5 is just about as heavy as the Cayenne S, it is exempt from the syndrome. It feels like it's going fast (4.8i)... because it is.
__________________
'08 BMW X5 4.8i *'06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG *'05 Audi S4 Cabriolet

Vote Sprint Blue for a greater America
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:30 PM
jst2878's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The BIG Apple
Posts: 3,218
jst2878 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevnmurphy
I think the Range is a little faster, but I don't think they hold their value over time (like 5+years) as well as a 4.6 or 4.8 would. If you look on the road, you don't see many RR 4.6HSE models (1996 - 2002). I think RR has really lost their touch with reliability over the last decade. They are very luxurious, and great looking, but I just don't think they go off road like they used to, or hold up over time. From what I have heard, they kind of hit the wall at 60,000 miles.
In the overall comparison, I would think the 4.6is would be better in most.

I think it is a little bit faster! r u serious?!! My 4.4 is fair competition for a RR sport. You have been misinformed by the wrong people my naive friend
__________________
2001 X5 4.4i WHITE-Loaded like a baby's diaper SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:50 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,198
Aimster is on a distinguished road
You buy a range rover and that car will be worth 10k in 5 years.

When the new model comes out... the current model is going to go down .. wayyy down
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2007, 12:51 PM
jwilburn's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,012
jwilburn is on a distinguished road
So a new RR vs CPO 4.6? They are pretty darn smiliar in performance I think. The RR has about 50 more hp. However its substantially heavier. I actually kept up with my friend's RRS SC well enough in my 4.4i.

Youre obviously going to be spending a lot more for a new car vs CPO. While I like the ride over the RR over an X with sport package, the BMW usually wins in mho overall. The back seats of the RR are really just for looks. And the comon comfort features are missing in the RR (ie one touch up and down windows, able to move the seats w/o turning the car on, ect)

Good luck in your decision.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2007, 03:08 PM
ljnlaw's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Land of REAL Cheese Steaks...And the home of the 2008 World Series Champion Phillies
Posts: 1,567
ljnlaw is on a distinguished road
The 4.6is beats the RR no contest in 0-60...

RR supercharged sport....does 60 in 7 seconds

4.6is...does 60 between 6.2 and 6.4 seconds (depending on where you read the stats, I have never tested mine but it hauls azz in sport mode)
__________________
EDELSTEIN MARTIN & NELSON
www.law-pa.com
www.insurancedisabilitylawyer.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2007, 03:23 PM
rodberg007's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 79
rodberg007 is on a distinguished road
The Range Rover Supercharged still looks the dogs...
click on the link to see how good they really are... especially when racing a tank!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p_j-wPyl2c
Attached Images
 

Last edited by rodberg007; 08-14-2007 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2007, 03:22 PM
Sudesh's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: N.Ireland/Worldwide
Posts: 1,156
Sudesh is on a distinguished road
A friend of mine has both, and he said the 4.6 is a quicker and much better vehicle, hence to say he gave the RR to his wife and always drives the 4.6!
__________________
Quote:
Do Not Go Where The Path May Lead, Go Instead Where There Is No Path & Leave A Trail
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.