|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Standard Vs Z on an X3
Hey guys, does anyone know if having a standard tire and a Z tire on the same car makes a difference/has an effect on this?
We bought our 04 X3 in August, and now when I drive it, I dont like how the transmission feels. It is a hard shift at low speeds sometimes and I get a weird RPM "flutter" when slowing down/coasting at approx 30mph. Anyways a local mechanic pointed out to me that the tires in the front are different sizes than those in the rear. The measurements are all the same (235/35/17), however the rears are Z rated. I can really see a difference in size though. The fronts definitely look bigger. Can tires have the same measurements on their side walls but really be different sizes? Can this cause issues? |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Become a BMW CCA member! Click HERE to join and feel free to use my BMW CCA member #191509 as a referral.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
My rear tires are worn. That is a fairly rare size, but I can get a pretty good deal on some lightly used, nice 275/45R19 tires, but of course I'm concerned with causing TC problems. I know that buying a new set of 4 Michelins at the dealer, and replacing the never used, but 14 years old spare as well will work, and many here would do just that. Not me. So first question on the TC tolerance on difference in rotations front to rear - JCL quotes 3-4 per mile should be good, and I think I saw that somewhere else too. But then the quote on towing (also confirmed in the owner's manual) - that seems EXTREMELY more stressful than the 3-4 revs/mile difference for driving. It would make me think that the real limit may be higher than 3-4. Comments? Also, I ran some numbers for myself calculating the differences in tire diameter and revs per mile for different tires. Following is the output for my current situation. 1 - 285/45R19 on rear, with about 8/32" of wear gone (not remaining) 2 - 255/50R19 on front, 4/32" worn 3 - 235/65R17 spare, 0/32" worn 4 - 275/45R19 candidate replacement for rear, 2/32" worn revs_per_mile = 705.2 700.5 694.8 704.7 diameter_mm = 726.4 731.3 737.3 726.9 Comments - the candidate tire fits better than the existing one due to lower wear. The spare is further out. BTW, if I did not account for tire wear, here are the results (assuming all tires were brand new with no wear): revs_per_mile = 693.1 694.5 694.8 701.6 (brand new, all specified tires are in a tight range) diameter_mm = 739.1 737.6 737.3 730.1 I know this does not account for manufacturing tolerances, inexact tire design, inflation, load, etc. Does this seem like a safe plan? BTW, the TC is pretty new, dealer installed by the PO a year before I bought it.
__________________
2001 X5 3.0i, 203k miles, AT, owned since 2014 |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't have a single answer for you, but I can give you some data points and a suggestion.
The BMW workshop manual lists a 1% maximum allowable difference between tires to avoid transfer case damage, on the x drive transfer case. I don't have the published figure for the non x drive transfer case. 1% works out to about 7 revs/mile, so that is their hard limit. I have used 4 revs/mile as my own limit, based on previous discussions with dealer service personnel and my own experience with other awd vehicles. I deal with a good tire shop. I recently had a tire receive a cut to a sidewall on a lightly worn Pirelli Scorpion on an x drive vehicle. They supplied one new tire to replace it. I had purchased 4 tires from them not too long ago. Turns out they covered most of the cost via a road hazard warranty I had, but that was a bonus. They checked the other tires, and told me I was OK with replacing only one. I asked, and the limit they used was 40% wear on a same size tire compared to the new one. Not sure how many revs/mile that is, but your calculator would tell you. I guessed it was around 5 revs/mile, but I didn't calculate it. You can see from your calculator how tightly BMW aimed to have them grouped when new, less than 2 revs/mile. It appears that with your worn front tires, the used tires you found would work. It appears that if you do that, when you next replace your front tires you may need a plan B. Perhaps change the front size to match the rear if the tread wear is close. I wouldn't worry as much about the spare. Good luck Jeff
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
2001 X5 3.0i, 203k miles, AT, owned since 2014 |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
To the guy that asked about the 285/45 and 255/55 combination. These are identical in over all diameter. One of them makes 693 revolutions per mile, the other makes 694. The 255 makes the extra revolution.
The overall diameter is 29.098 and 29.039, respectively. These are identical for any practical purpose. You have no worries about the drive train using these two sizes. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
And, to dot the i and cross the t, The 235/65x17 is also in there at 695 revs. per mile. All of these sizes are suitable for use at the same time on your car. That is, the spare can be used anywhere and will play well with the other three.
As with any spare, you will want to get the damaged tire repaired or replaced as soon as is practical. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|