|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
My guess is the 'fully charged' point is set to early ? |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Funf Dreisig |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Arr yes, I think you mentioned that before. strange that they would not do that for U.S. cars as its only programming as I understand it.
I picked up a small voltage logger today but it hasn't got any W7 64bit drivers so i can't program it at the moment. Once I get them I am going to hang it on our e70 battery just to have a look at how the system works |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If I hadn't called them, who knows when my parts would have shown up. Unacceptable... Craig |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not an excuse, but here's one possible explanation.
With the US Diesel being new, BMW probably did not expect any temperature sensors to be required, since temperature sensors are typically rather reliable and last a long time. From the postings I've seen, it's pretty clear the the temperature sensors were failing at a much greater rate than expected. This probably put them into a shortage position and left BMW with the choice of using the limited inventory to build and sell more vehicles, or to fix existing customers' vehicles promptly. I suspect they gave building and selling more vehicles priority. In the meantime, either the vendor could not supply more sensors quickly for one reason or another, or BWM wanted a design or manufacturing change to fix whatever was causing them to fail so quickly. BMW would probably put a temperature sensor prone to failure in a new vehicle, if the alternative was to not manufacturer and sell the vehicle (knowing they probably would have to fix a lot of them under warranty later). But they might wait on replacing failed sensors in the already sold vehicles until the new, more reliable design sensor was available. Yeah, I know doing something like that stinks, but having been in the industry a long time ago, I know how companies would not want to lose a vehicle sale because of not having a reliable temperature sensor. |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Some people around here call their X5s 'trucks" but the GX460 really is a truck - separate-chassis construction, live axle at the back, low-range gearing. Great off road but pretty sloppy on road compared to the X. In Australia they put different engines in it (a 4.0-litre petrol six and a 3.0-litre four-cyl TD) and call it a Toyota LandCruiser Prado (150 Series). Not trying to put your new ride down as I'm sure you'll find it smooth and comfortable ... and hopefully 100% reliable. Good luck with it. |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks,
Craig |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Consumer Reports Says Lexus GX 460 Is Unsafe - Wheels Blog - NYTimes.com |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob X5 pics at Flickr Last edited by rh71; 04-13-2010 at 04:35 PM. |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I drove the Toyota equivalent to the GX 460 the handling was so bad that I thought that one or more of the tyres were partially flat. I even stopped to have a look at them and then checked the pressure at the next service station. But everything was okay.
And my point of comparison is a E53 diesel with non-sport suspension, 17-inch wheels and all-terrain tyres, so it's hardy at the pointy end of X5 handling spectrum. (Just more practical as a good percentage of my driving is on rough, unsealed roads, farm tracks etc. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|