|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
If that is the part K&N specifies for the X5 (and it is) then you can-but really why would you? Regardless of the K&N marketing hype that says you will gain power, you won't-not a bit. Also, nothing filters better than the stock filter. A K&N filter will let larger dirt particles through its filter and into your engine, all for more money and no gain in power.
It's your money, but it would be wasted on a drop-in K&N filter.
__________________
Eric Giles '04 M3 '07 X5 3.0si Many others. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not a big K&N Fan...i prefer stock or foam filters on my vehicles
__________________
2011 X35d - Platinum Grey/Black/Bamboo Premium, Convenience, Technology, Rear Climate, ipod/sat - 1st Time BMW Owner 2006 Dodge 2500 Diesel (7500lbs and 13.4 Sec Qtr Mile) 2010 KTM 530 & 300 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wouldn't use a K&N filter either.
__________________
Profeshenal spellar |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanx for the info. Were can I get the stock BMW filter?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
OEM / Performance Parts for Audi, BMW, Mercedes Benz, Mini, Porsche & Volkswagen - ECS Tuning. (xoutpost sponsor).
__________________
---------------------------------------------- 2006 X5 3.0L - Schwarz Black/Truffle Brown Stock But I keep it clean
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wouldn't filter be covered under 48mo/50k miles service by BMW?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I also suspect the OP was thinking that a K&N would 'add 10 hp', 'filter better', etc. A page full of Threads here on the topic; I would take a Pasadena on the K&N, imo. GL, mD
__________________
Ol'UncleMotor From the Home Base of Pro Bono Punditry and 50 Cent Opins... Our Mtn Scenes, Car Pics, and Road Trip Pics on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627297418250/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627332480833/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/45275375@N00/ My X Page ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Years ago with a BMW K bike, someone did a test to determine the potential of more free-flowing air filters. What they did is simply cover half of the stock filter with plastic or paper, such that the active flow area was half of normal. They then did a dyno test with "half a filter" and normal. There was no HP difference between the two, i.e., the stock filter flowed so well that "clogging" half of it had no impact on HP. With those results, it is difficult to believe a more free-flowing air filter would have any impact on K bike HP.
It would be interesting to see a dyno comparison of an X5 with the stock filter and with no filter whatsoever, to more precisely identify the absolute maximum potential, if any, of reducing air filter resistance to air flow, without making changes in other areas (figuring no filter has the absolute least air flow resistance). I suspect the answer might surprise many people. P.S. Here is a link to the only independent test of air filters I've come across. It doesn't address HP gains, but does show the trade-off between restriction and efficiency, at least for these particular filters: ISO 5011 Duramax Air Filter Test Report Last edited by Penguin; 01-27-2011 at 04:00 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Recent discussion:
http://www.xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-foru...ilter-x5m.html Another one: http://www.xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-foru...e-3-0-e70.html
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|