Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   The Lounge (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/)
-   -   Should the U.S. launch covert strikes on Iran??? (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/26343-should-u-s-launch-covert-strikes-iran.html)

Aimster 02-02-2007 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WagnerX5
"All evidence", wow, didn't know you were involved in the situation and had active knowledge of all evidence. Sorry. Iran is definitely working in Iraq right now, even the Iraqi leadership asked Iran not to wage a battle against the US via Iraq. I guess they just did a preemptive strike, since there was "no evidence" and everything.

Show me one piece of evidence that proves it.

The Iraqi government's evidence was "we assume"

When you find that one piece of fact that links Iran to Iraq be sure to share it with us.

Wagner 02-02-2007 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimster
Show me one piece of evidence that proves it.

The Iraqi government's evidence was "we assume"

When you find that one piece of fact that links Iran to Iraq be sure to share it with us.


Show me evidence that proves they aren't. You can't so don't front as though lack of evidence makes it so.

Aimster 02-02-2007 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WagnerX5
Show me evidence that proves they aren't. You can't so don't front as though lack of evidence makes it so.

So you are basing your strong opinion based on assumptions rather than facts.
Gotcha.

Wagner 02-02-2007 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimster
So you are basing your strong opinion based on assumptions rather than facts.
Gotcha.


Exact same thing you did, you just took the other position. So congratz. My opinion came off no stronger then the "no evidence" opinion you shared. You have no facts to back up your side, just suggestions...reports and ideas.....same as my opinion.

As I said earlier, the US shouldn't launch any strikes on Iran......if that is done the "allies" (aka SA) should do it.

Aimster 02-02-2007 08:25 AM

My facts are there are no facts.

Which means since there are no facts the issue needs to be dropped.

Thats like me saying, the U.S was behind 9/11. Prove to mee they weren't. The people who believe it have no facts to back up their bogus claim, just a bunch of assumptions.

Nobody listens to them because they have zero facts.

Wagner 02-02-2007 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimster
My facts are there are no facts.

Which means since there are no facts the issue needs to be dropped.

Thats like me saying, the U.S was behind 9/11. Prove to mee they weren't. The people who believe it have no facts to back up their bogus claim, just a bunch of assumptions.

Nobody listens to them because they have zero facts.

OK.

Good article on the way Iran has worked in the past to "battle" the US.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051901761.html

It discusses the "non presence" of Iran in Iraq, but also delves into the ideas that Iran doesn't usually put "troops on the ground" when fighting the US interest.

Aimster 02-02-2007 08:40 AM

So based on the "past", Iran should attack the U.S ASAP because the past has shown the U.S has made it possible for tens of thousands of Iranians to die. Almost all of them civilians.

So with those assumptions, the U.S must be behind the terrorist attacks inside Iran. Yes, there are terrorist attacks inside Iran and since the U.S is next door and has attacked Iran in the past indirectly, they must be behind them.

Wagner 02-02-2007 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimster
So based on the "past", Iran should attack the U.S ASAP because the past has shown the U.S has made it possible for tens of thousands of Iranians to die. Almost all of them civilians.

So with those assumptions, the U.S must be behind the terrorist attacks inside Iran. Yes, there are terrorist attacks inside Iran and since the U.S is next door and has attacked Iran in the past indirectly, they must be behind them.


Where are you going, you have completely left the topic? In the need to defend your opinion against mine via assumption junction. I tried to drop an actual article pertaining to the original topic of this thread. Where do you want to take it.....I already agreed with your "no facts are facts" disclosure.

rjs1222 02-02-2007 09:43 AM

Isn't this proof that Iranians are in Iraq?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2355951.shtml

AzX5 02-02-2007 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjs1222
Isn't this proof that Iranians are in Iraq?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2355951.shtml

Sounds pretty proof-positive to me, and from a liberal network even! Will this convince the anti-American socialists on this board? Not a chance...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.