Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   The Lounge (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/)
-   -   Vista Home license forbids virtualization (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/26486-vista-home-license-forbids-virtualization.html)

Quicksilver 02-02-2007 04:46 AM

Vista Home license forbids virtualization
 
If you want to run Microsoft’s new Vista operating system on a Mac using Parallels Desktop for Mac, you’re going to have to buy the Enterprise or Ultimate editions. Parallels’ Ben Rudolph recently posted about the issue on the official Parallels Virtualization Blog.

http://parallelsvirtualization.blogs...-mean-for.html

xnsf 02-02-2007 06:33 AM

how clever of microsoft...making people buy the more expensive versions of vista to try to compensate a little bit of the money they lost when pc people switched to macs. if you have to run windows, you have no choice but to buy it...though there is still xp......well played gates

Wagner 02-02-2007 06:35 AM

Money Microsoft lost.....haha..now that is funny. Wish I was the richest man in the world. :)

I don't think the new OS is all that expensive, especially considering the development costs.

xnsf 02-02-2007 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WagnerX5
Money Microsoft lost.....haha..now that is funny. Wish I was the richest man in the world. :)

I don't think the new OS is all that expensive, especially considering the development costs.

true...i'm just looking for conspiracies :eek: especially from microsoft

Juanted 02-02-2007 07:59 AM

Many, many people run Windows in a VM session. Most of them are not Mac users.

asawadude 02-02-2007 09:20 AM

I remember seeing an article in Maximum PC where some dude had every version of Windows (v1, v2, v3, WFWG, 95, 98, ME, NT, 2K, XP) running simultaneously on one computer in separate VM sessions which leads to the question - why?

I'm not seeing the practical side of running Vista on a Mac OS Intel box other than for the novelty unless there is a need to run some type of proprietary Windows software, i.e. a specialized work or business program, but what's the point when PC's are reasonably cheap?

Quicksilver 02-02-2007 12:01 PM

I'm sure people run windows on a Mac for practical reasons of their own. Novelty not included,

Quote:

Originally Posted by asawadude
I'm not seeing the practical side of running Vista on a Mac OS Intel box other than for the novelty unless there is a need to run some type of proprietary Windows software, i.e. a specialized work or business program

If you can't figure that out i don't know what to tell ya. It's been covered over and over again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by asawadude
What's the point when PC's are reasonably cheap?


dmlgc 02-02-2007 12:49 PM

I run winxp on my Mac with Parallels only because I have one program for which there is no Mac equivalent, streets and trips.
This is stupid on Microsoft’s part, someone will have a crack up
before long.

JV 02-02-2007 01:21 PM

CNet calls Vista a Service Pack. After seeing an in-store demo of a Mac Pro with XP last month, my next home puter will be a Mac.

Quicksilver 02-02-2007 01:44 PM

Running XP right now on a 24 inch iMac. Amazing. It's suppose to be faster with bootcamp but i don't have that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JV
CNet calls Vista a Service Pack. After seeing an in-store demo of a Mac Pro with XP last month, my next home puter will be a Mac.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.