Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   The Lounge (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/)
-   -   Camera Heads... (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/lounge/62789-camera-heads.html)

motordavid 08-29-2009 03:51 PM

Yes, 2 pounds before lens and the price of the D300, put it out of my consideration;
even if it was less expensive, I don't need that size/weight for a cam. I lugged an
8 x 10 Calumet View Cam for a few years and, my bro-in-law's Mamiya 6x9 film
cam, and those kinds of weights are not practical, imo.

I am very surprised that the Nikon D5000, which I was really liking, (even w/out
the in-cam stabilization), has IS0 200 for its lowest setting. Jeeshh.

I was smitten with the size/price and the electronics are right up there, specs-wise,
of the D5000, but I think that IS0 setting is a squasher.

This is tougher than shopping for a new car, in some ways. I think it may be the
last big buck DSLR I buy, body-wise. It's driving me crazy. :yikes:

Scottie 08-29-2009 04:12 PM

Canon 450D is your other option within your budget.

The thing is though:

You like Cameras

You take a good few pictures

it seems to me you live in area that you can take some cracking pictures .

You say it's your last big camera purchase.

Well make it a good purchase spend a bit more and get yourself the D300 and a decent Tripod.

You can build up on the lenses.

Sigma are often better than Nikon now for their lenses.

Weight of the D300 is not that bad I use ours:cool: and it has the battery pack on and when the big telephoto lens is on it can be heavy but still usable.

motordavid 08-29-2009 04:32 PM

Fiona,
Good points...but you are much younger, probably in better shape/easier on the
eyes, and stronger than I am. ;)

motordavid 08-29-2009 04:37 PM

Side by side comparos of 3 Nikons...
I must be missing something here.

And, ISO 200, effectively, in all 3?!
Maybe they cover the higher ISO
via the CCD/image processor.

Digital Cameras Side-by-Side, 3 cameras: Digital Photography Review

Not trying to"buy" on specs alone, but it looks like the GM cars of the
'80s, package-wise, and price spread wise...

I need a nap. ;>)

EDIT: The DP Site is currently "off the air". :confused:

rayxi 08-29-2009 05:32 PM

I'm going to make a Canon recommendation, not because I think it's better than Nikon but because I'm more familiar with the Canon lenses.

EOS 50D with the 17-85mm IS USM zoom (do not get the standard 18-55 kit lens). Around $1500.
2807B012 Canon EOS 50D Digital SLR Camera Body Kit, 15.1 Megapixels, Black with EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 USM Image Stabilized Lens - USA Warranty

Add one of the 4 available 70-200 L tele-zoom's later and you are golden.

If you are interested in HD video then the new Rebel T1i is an option as well. Same lens reco applies.

chefwong 08-29-2009 07:14 PM

MD -

For 2K, I'd run with a D90, SB-400 flash, Flip-It Bounce Card, 18-55 and 55-200 lense.
I love wides - have a 12-24 2.8, but if you don't feel like you want/need the wide range,

I would most def. recommend the 35mm 1.8G Prime Lense.

Gd Luck.

Quicksilver 08-29-2009 07:42 PM

I'm no camera buff but this is at the top of my list.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned it.
I know some of you pros will have an opinion
but David if you can open that wallet of yours a bit more
this might be the ticket.

Canon Digital Learning Center - EOS 5D Mark II: Laforet on Reverie

Thunder22 08-29-2009 08:24 PM

David,

Canon 50D with 28-135IS $1279
Canon 70-200 F4 $629

total $1908

motordavid 08-29-2009 10:14 PM

I'm looking, trying to sort it out, and have the Jones on my back...

Thank you for all the good opins. I don't usually wring hands, or
ask a dozen people "should I buy this stock". This is more
worrisome than picking out a new car.
Thank you, Maties.
Ol'UncMtr

Thunder22 08-30-2009 09:08 AM

Costco - Canon EOS 50D 6.3 Frames per Second Rechargeable Battery


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.