Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:04 PM
Eric5273's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,459
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
Any Network Administrators/IT Techs out there? Need advise...

I'm purchasing new computers for my company and I need some advise. I'm fairly knowledgeable about computers, but it's been over 5 years since we purchased a server, so I'm not familiar with all the new server hardware.

Background: We are a small business, have a server and 4 workstations, and mostly use Microsoft Office programs, including a large Microsoft Access database. Our email & website are hosted elsewhere.

I know what I need as far as workstations. Where I need help is the server. I am looking at Dell's low end servers, and while I understand the various options, I'm not sure what is actually necessary and what would be overkill. So I have some questions:

1) Processor: My options are (from cheapest to most expensive):

Pentium 4
Dual Core Pentium D
Xeon
Dual Core Xeon

The Dual Core Pentium D, and the regular Xeon both will cost around the same. The Dual Core Xeon is quite a bit more expensive. I really have no idea what the differences are between these. They all seem to have similar clock speeds. I do see that the Xeons have faster FSB speeds. I also see that the FSB speed various within each processor type and you can spend a few hundred extra just on getting a faster FSB speed. Any recommendations?

2) RAM: The Dell salesperson is recommending 2 GB RAM. Is that overkill and would we really notice a difference over 1 GB considering we only have 4 workstations?

3) Hard Drive Array: I want to get a RAID 1 system, as I like the security of knowing that a hard drive failure will not cause us any headaches. Last time around we got a SCSI RAID system, but now I see that they also have a SATA system RAID 1 system. Again, considering the size of our network, will we notice any real speed difference between the two? The cost to go with the SCSI system is about $600 additional, so unless the difference will be very noticeable, I'd rather not spend the money. Also, if we go for the SCSI, there is a more expensive controller that has "hardware RAID" as opposed to "software RAID" on the cheaper controller. On a system this small, will there be any difference between those two?


Thanks for any advise.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.