Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2006, 08:45 PM
Quicksilver's Avatar
Premier Member and retired relic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 17,184
Quicksilver will become famous soon enoughQuicksilver will become famous soon enough
Did you ever wonder how much it costs a drug company for the active ingredients?

Surprise surprise. Don't bother looking at Snopes this one is true.


Make sure you read all the way past the list of the drugs. The woman that signed below is a Budget Analyst out of federal Washington, DC offices.

Did you ever wonder how much it costs a drug company for the active ingredient in prescription medications? Some people think it must cost a lot, since many drugs sell for more than $2.00 per tablet. We did a search
of offshore chemical synthesizers that supply the active ingredients found in drugs approved by the FDA. As we have revealed in past issues of Life Extension, a significant percentage of drugs sold in the United States
contain active ingredients made in other countries. In our independent investigation of how much profit drug companies really make, we obtained the actual price of active ingredients used in some of the most popular
drugs sold in America.

The data below speaks for itself.

Celebrex: 100 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $130.27
Cost of general active ingredients: $ 0.60
Percent markup: 21,712%


Claritin: 1 0 mg
Consumer Price (100 t ablets): $215.17
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.71
Percent markup: 30,306%

Keflex: 250 mg
Consumer Price (100 tablets): $157.39
Cost of general active ingredients: $1.88
Percent markup: 8,372%

Lipitor: 20 mg
Consumer Price (100 tablets): $272.37
Cost of general active ingredients: $5.80
Percent markup: 4,696%

Norvasc: 10 mg Cost of general active ingredien t s: $0.14
Percent markup: 134,493% < BR>

Paxil: 20 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $220.27
Cost of general active ingredients: $7.60
Percent markup: 2,898%

Prevacid: 30 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $44.77
Cost of general active ingredients: $1.01
Percent markup: 34,136%

Prilosec: 20 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $360.97
Cost of general active ingredients $0.52
Percent markup: 69,417%

Prozac: 20 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets) : $247.47
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.11
Percent markup: 224,973%

Tenormin: 50 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $104.47
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.13
Percent markup: 80,362%

Vasotec: 10 mg
Consumer price (100 tab le ts): $102.37
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.20
Percent markup: 51,185%

Xanax: 1 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets) : $136.79
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.024
Percent markup: 569,958%
Zestril: 20 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets) $89.89
Cost of general active ingredients $3.20
Percent markup: 2,809

Zithromax: 600 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $1,482.19
Cost of general active ingredients: $18.78
Percent markup: 7,892%

Zocor: /B 40 mg
Consumer price (100 tablets): $350.27
Cost of general active ingredients: $8.63
Percent markup: 4,059%

Zoloft: 50 mg
Consumer price: $206.87
Cost of general active ingredients: $1.75
Percent markup: 11,821%


On Monday night, Steve Wilson, an investigative reporter for Channel 7 News in Detroit , did a story on generic drug price gouging by pharmacies. He found in his investigation, that some of these generic drugs were marked up as much as 3,000% or more. Yes, that's not a typo.....three thousand percent! So often, we blame the drug companies for the high cost of drugs, and usually rightfully so. But in this case, the fault clearly lies with the pharmacies themselves. For example, if you had to buy a prescription drug, and bought the name brand, you might pay $100 for 100 pills. The pharmacist might tell you that if you get the generic equivalent, they would only cost $80, making you think you are "saving" $20. What the pharmacist is not telling you is that those 100 generic pills may have only cost him $10!

At the end of the report, one of the anchors asked Mr. Wilson whether or not there were any pharmacies that did not adhere to this practice, and he said that Costco consistently charged little over their cost for the generic drugs.

I went to the Costco site, where you can look up any drug, and get its online price. It says that the in-store prices are consistent with the online prices. I was appalled. Just to give you one example from my own experience, I had to use the drug, Compazine, which helps prevent nausea in chemo patients. I used the generic equivalent, which cost $54.99 for 60 pills at CVS. I checked the price at Costco, and I could have bought 100 pills for $19.89. For 145 of my pain pills, I paid $72.57. I could have got 150 at Costco for $28.08.

I would like to mention, that although Costco is a "membership" type store, you do NOT have to be a member to buy prescriptions there, as it is a federally regulated substance. You just tell them at the door that you wish to use the pharmacy, and they will let you in. (this is true)


Sharon L. Davis
Budget Analyst
U.S Department of Commerce
Room 6839
Office Ph: 202-482-4458
Office Fax: 202-482-5480
E-mail Address: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2006, 09:21 PM
PeteG's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 419
PeteG is on a distinguished road
Big Pharma is the richest industry in the world. Does this info surprise you? Not me.

I'm sure we'll have those that will rationalize and support them for what they charge, citing research money, time invested, etc. Don't believe the hype, though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:11 PM
Quicksilver's Avatar
Premier Member and retired relic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 17,184
Quicksilver will become famous soon enoughQuicksilver will become famous soon enough
I kinda figured as much although I had no figures. Surprise me? Na. Nothing surprises me anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteG
Big Pharma is the richest industry in the world. Does this info surprise you? Not me.
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:26 PM
Eric5273's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,513
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteG
I'm sure we'll have those that will rationalize and support them for what they charge, citing research money, time invested, etc. Don't believe the hype, though.
You are right, that is the reason they use to justify the large markups. But what most people don't know is that its our tax money that pays for most of the research for these drugs.

The government gives large research grants to these companies, and then when they develop the drugs they are allowed to keep ownership of the pantents. If our tax money is going to pay for the research, then the patents should go into the public domain (i.e socialized medicine). Otherwise, let the drug companies pay for their own research and let us keep our tax money.

A friend of mine always jokes that the United States is not a Capitalist country. He says we have a mixed system: Socialism for the rich and Capitalism for the poor. This is a fine example of how that mixed system functions.
__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:03 AM
AutoXer's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,983
AutoXer is on a distinguished road
I will just toss my comments in here. The costs for the ingredients and manufacturing are miniscule as compared to what goes on in the big pharmaceutical companies. I use to do research for a medical device company and the hoops we have to jump through to get a product past the FDA were many and large. Then there are all the failed projects that never gets to market. Then after a drug gets to market, the company has to worry about the potential law suits that might come it's way.

Running a pharmaceutical company is not as easy as it seems. Yes, they make lots of money at times. But at other times, they eat it in the shorts too. A case in point, I am a Merck stock holder and have owned their stock since the early 1990's. Never sold (stupid me), and have seen it go way up and came way back down. All the other pharmaceutical stocks did the same. So unfortunately even at the gross profit margins mentioned, they still are not making money!

I am not defending the prices, but just some observations about the industry.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2006, 08:15 AM
SuperGreg's Avatar
SuperHero
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Good Ol' USA
Posts: 7,800
SuperGreg is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AutoXer
I will just toss my comments in here. The costs for the ingredients and manufacturing are miniscule as compared to what goes on in the big pharmaceutical companies. I use to do research for a medical device company and the hoops we have to jump through to get a product past the FDA were many and large. Then there are all the failed projects that never gets to market. Then after a drug gets to market, the company has to worry about the potential law suits that might come it's way.

Running a pharmaceutical company is not as easy as it seems. Yes, they make lots of money at times. But at other times, they eat it in the shorts too. A case in point, I am a Merck stock holder and have owned their stock since the early 1990's. Never sold (stupid me), and have seen it go way up and came way back down. All the other pharmaceutical stocks did the same. So unfortunately even at the gross profit margins mentioned, they still are not making money!

I am not defending the prices, but just some observations about the industry.
yep, and the fact that only about 1% of new drugs make it to market.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2006, 09:05 PM
PeteG's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 419
PeteG is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AutoXer
I will just toss my comments in here. The costs for the ingredients and manufacturing are miniscule as compared to what goes on in the big pharmaceutical companies. I use to do research for a medical device company and the hoops we have to jump through to get a product past the FDA were many and large. Then there are all the failed projects that never gets to market. Then after a drug gets to market, the company has to worry about the potential law suits that might come it's way.

Running a pharmaceutical company is not as easy as it seems. Yes, they make lots of money at times. But at other times, they eat it in the shorts too. A case in point, I am a Merck stock holder and have owned their stock since the early 1990's. Never sold (stupid me), and have seen it go way up and came way back down. All the other pharmaceutical stocks did the same. So unfortunately even at the gross profit margins mentioned, they still are not making money!

I am not defending the prices, but just some observations about the industry.
Even with all the hoops, "losses" and drugs that never get approved, they still make record profits, especially when compared to other industries. Remember, profits is the money left over AFTER all the expenses, including the losses. Check the links below:

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortu...uticals/1.html

http://www.citizen.org/documents/Pharma_Report.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2006, 09:28 PM
dkosters's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 16
dkosters is on a distinguished road
So open your own drug company and let the profits flow......



Seriously--you only have to look at Vioxx to see how things can go bad in a hurry. Who do you think pays for the $250 million dollar lawsuit judgement (for just one of the thousands of pending cases)? You and I do.

Yes, drug companies could do things better and cheaper (and maybe safer) but who wants to wait 25 years for a new drug to come to market.

This is just the tip of the iceberg on the state of health care today--just don't suggest fixing it by socialized medicine. I know tons of people in health care today that would quit tomorrow if that happened.
__________________
'08 335xi - Black/Black - 6-speed manual
'07 Mustang GT/CS - Red/Black - Nuthin' Beats a V8
'04 X5 4.4i Silver Ext. / Gray Int. / Loaded (Gone but not forgotten)
'05 Mercury Montego (Wife's Car)
'03 H-D V-Rod -- Custom Paint, Wheels, Seat, Exhaust, blah, blah, blah
'07 BMW R1200S Red/Silver -- Light 'n Fast
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2006, 09:52 PM
sdogg888's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 375
sdogg888 is on a distinguished road
thats why people are making fake pills and selling them online.....
__________________
Why do they sterilize the needles for lethal injections?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2006, 11:19 PM
Eric5273's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,513
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
I am a fan of socialized medicine. People's health and lives are not something that should be a profit making business.

Just as the military and the police and fire departments are not privatized, neither should health care be. When it comes to protecting people and saving their lives, money should not enter the equation.

And as a result of our privatized health care system, not only are we spending far more on health care than any other country in the world, but we are also falling behing the rest of the industrialized world in quality of health care...

U.S. health care system falling behind

Gannett News Service

WASHINGTON - The nation’s youngest and oldest citizens are suffering the most from a fragmented, wasteful and in some cases dangerous health care system, according to a new study. When compared to nearly two dozen other industrialized countries, the U.S. has the highest infant mortality rate and the lowest life expectancy for people who have reached the age of 60.

Those statistics were part of a sobering new look at the U.S. health care system released today by The Commonwealth Fund’s Commission on a High Performance Health System.

“There are many pockets of excellence in health in this country, but overall we are performing far below our national potential,” said James Mongan, a physician and chairman of the commission.

The study looked at 37 national indicators of health outcomes, quality, access, equity and efficiency and assigned a score to each.

The U.S. scored an average of 66 out of a possible 100, a failing grade.

If performance were improved in key areas, the nation could save an estimated 150,000 lives and perhaps as much as $100 billion annually, the report’s authors concluded.

For example, if health care providers increased the proportion of patients who have their diabetes and high blood pressure under control, as many as 40,000 deaths per year could be prevented at a savings of at least $1 billion, according to the National Committee for Quality Assurance.

Other troubling symptoms:

-- Six years after a landmark report on medical errors, the U.S. still lacks an error reporting system to assess safety. In the past two years, one-third of patients reported a medical, medication or lab test mistake.

-- Nearly one in four U.S. adults reported having to wait at least six days to receive care when they needed medical attention.

-- Hispanics are far more likely to lack health insurance than other ethnic and racial groups.

-- The mortality rate among black Americans is significantly higher at infancy and for those with heart disease or diabetes. Blacks also have considerably lower rates of cancer survival.

The Commonwealth Fund is a private foundation supporting independent research on health and social issues.
__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.