|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
3.7 x 2 x .95 Lumix FX3 3.56 x 2.24 x .8 Canon SD630 IOW, the Lumix is a slightly "longer" and thicker, but the Canon is 1/4" taller. Note that the Lumix weighs (WITH battery) 5.8oz, whereas the Canon weighs 6.2oz, so the Lumix is actually lighter. The bottom line is that they're both equally "pocketable." Frankly, you won't go wrong with either of those cameras. My experience is just that one of the major drawbacks of p&s cameras is the difficulty avoiding blurry photos, and Lumix has a significant advantage in that regard. BTW, if you have time, you might want to check out these (and any other cameras you are considering) at www.dpreview.com -- it is the most respected independent source of reviews for camera equipment around, and is used by most of the professional photographers (and semi-pros) I know.
__________________
Bruce 2003 "Dinan S3" X5 4.6is - Estoril Blue (450hp w/ supercharger) 2008 E60 M5 - Monaco Blue www.UnderwaterReflections.com www.seattleyates.com |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|