9/11 Witness - Page 6

rjs1222 · #51 12-20-2006, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric5273

My bad. You are correct.

On pages 13 & 14 in his book Against All Enemies, Clarke says that the FBI had distributed a list with the identities of 18 of the 19 hijackers (including 3 of the 4 hijackers on Flight 93) prior to 10 AM on 9/11. He says he is sure of the time because he remembers that he was reading the list when the North tower collapsed at 9:59 AM.

Yet according to the 9/11 Commission Report, the FAA first became aware that Flight 93 was hijacked at 10:08 AM, at which time they notified NORAD.

Care to explain this?

He could have been given a list with 500 names on it and the hijackers were on it. People can skew or omit information any way they want to make a point. Why is it so easy for you to belive any tidbit of information you read on the web that suits your point of view. A while back you said the 9-11 hijackers had no contact with Al Queda. Recently they showed video of some of the hijackers meeting with Bin Laden, how do you explain that?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1982773.shtml

Sponsored Links

AzX5 · #52 12-20-2006, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjs1222

...A while back you said the 9-11 hijackers had no contact with Al Queda. Recently they showed video of some of the hijackers meeting with Bin Laden, how do you explain that?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1982773.shtml

I think Eric said that wasn't Bin Laden, instead it was a CIA operative in a costume or some shiite like that...

China Man · #53 12-20-2006, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asawadude

What's the point of trolling a political story on an automotive forum unless, of course, you can't find acceptance anywhere else?

ron_jeremy · #54 12-20-2006, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric5273

This was not posted to set up another tiresome debate on the subject.

I posted this article for the people who are actually interested in such things. For example, I'm guessing that blondboi and Wagner both found the article interesting, and perhaps a few others as well. Since this subject has indeed been debated in this forum in the past, I know that there are some in this forum who are actually intersted in the 9/11 truth movement, and I'm guessing that some of them did not know about this guy and what he had to say. I certainly did not know prior to reading this and a couple of other articles this past week.

So if you don't want to read the article, then don't. As for the comments about it somehow disrespecting those killed on 9/11 by wanting to know the truth, that is just pure BS. I've been to some of the 9/11 truth movement conferences, and 99% of the people there organizing the events and speaking there are family members of victims killed in the attacks.

Others at these events include mostly former government people like former military, CIA & FBI, and one conference I went to even had a former member of George W. Bush's cabinet who spoke.

I for one, find this tread interesting.
But then again, i've not been a member for long, or been in the lounge for that long.
What took place 9.11, was a day to remember, for the whole world, i saw at job when it happens, and remember everything, it was chilling.
And since then, the world have not been or looked the same.
Not even in safe dull Norway where i live.

And guys, ok there will be different stories, and explenations, but to reallt get a grip of this, you need to look upon this from a birds point of view, from above.
So if someone else did this, what did they gain on it?
Who could have this power, and cover it up?

But then again, you guys (US) have a ton of these stories, area 51, Kennedy ...