Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 06-22-2007, 06:00 AM
Wagner's Avatar
..make it happn' capn'
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mt. Airy, MD
Posts: 17,686
Wagner is on a distinguished road
Thoughts and Opinions

Question: Can public imagery and publicly released video, audio or imagery in regards to crime investigations be used in a video game?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285795,00.html

Long story short, a child was murdered, during the investigation police released a grainy video of the child being taken away by the murderers in 1993. Fast forward over a decade later a video game uses black/white footage of the child being taken as a 'clue' in a game.

Now, is it okay for the video to use the public footage? Is it 'illegal' or simply in bad taste?

Second portion, do public figures have the right to say that public places can not be portrayed in a video game? For instance, does George Bush have the right to say real imagery of the Whitehouse can not be used in a video game?


IMO:
Any public footage is just that, public. While it may be in exceptionally bad taste to use real footage of an event (especially a murder of a child) I don't think you can call it illegal by any means. The footage is public, thus the public can then do with it as it pleases. The issue, IMO, is the classless society we have (globally) that finds this acceptable. As video games go, I for one would never play a game where I'm a criminal and need to kill police or others to "win". And as a father, I would never let my son touch a game that had the previously mentioned underlying concept. It comes down to society in general needing a stronger moral fiber. But, alas, I do not think it is in any way illegal. As for the buildings being featured, obviously I think that is fine and don't believe the context in which the image is used has any weight on whether or not it can be used.
__________________

An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.

"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


Last edited by Wagner; 06-22-2007 at 06:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.