|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
09-02-2008, 07:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
US open
It looks pretty open to me. 
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
09-02-2008, 02:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was wondering if anyone saw the REAL SPORTS segment last week discussing all the corruption and cheating (gambling) in professional tennis.
It was quite interesting really. I never knew the sport was that messed up. Makes you wonder why though, they don't just change the rules that ALL matches are counted against the players seat position rather than just the big tournaments and the matches that the player wants to have counted. It would seem that changing the rule could almost wipe out most of the unethical gambling and tanking practices in professional tennis..
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------  "When two people agree on everything, one of them is not necessary" - Arliss
|
|
#3
09-02-2008, 02:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
WHAT.......... "corruption and cheating (gambling) in professional tennis."
OMG.... What are we to do???? (Sorry B Couldn't resist) 
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.” Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance……. 
|
|
#4
09-02-2008, 03:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So while it may not seem like a big deal to us, clearly it is a big deal to lots of other people.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------- "When two people agree on everything, one of them is not necessary" - Arliss
|
|
#5
09-03-2008, 06:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 I guess it's present in almost every sport that has a lot of money in them.  I saw Federer yesterday, didn't impress me. Out of the four QF, i predict Nadal to beat Fish. Murray to beat Potro The other half Federer to beat Muller Roddick to beat Djokovick So SF should look like this Nadal vs Murray Federer vs Roddick. And the final nadal vs Roddick. I take my chances on Roddick in the final, he seems to be more hungry, and not so tired as those OG guys imo.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
