Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-04-2009, 02:57 PM
rayxi's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 4,171
rayxi is on a distinguished road
Blue/Bill: I'd have to agree with the reviewer in your link. The 70-200 f/4L is a much better choice than the 70-300 in this price range.

The 70-200 f/4L is sharper but lacks IS so that might be a bit of a wash depending on your application. The 70-300 has extra reach but it's right in the 200-300mm range where the IQ starts to deteriorate on this lens. Build quality is much better on the L lens.

The fact that the 70-300 is not parfocal and has a rotating front element is a deal-breaker IMO. That makes using a graduated ND or polarizing filter very awkward at best if not downright frustrating.

I will refrain from making CC on your pics as I don't have a jacket to take off at the moment.
__________________
Wake up every day that would be a start.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #32  
Old 09-04-2009, 03:06 PM
explicitdwk's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Astoria.
Posts: 210
explicitdwk is on a distinguished road
looks like an awesome trip! just wondering did you rent the boat or own it? because a boating trip sounds real relaxing
__________________
2006 4.4i Sterling Titanium/Black Interior
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:12 PM
E61Silver's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 6,162
E61Silver is an unknown quantity at this point
I own the boat, a 27 foot World Cat, but you can rent a "canal boat"

New York State Canals: Excursions and Vacations: Boats for Hire: Self-Skipper Canal Holidays
__________________
Loving my BMW

Last edited by E61Silver; 09-04-2009 at 09:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:10 AM
motordavid's Avatar
RetiredBum & Semi-RenaissanceMan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mtns of Western NC, & SW FLA
Posts: 16,828
motordavid will become famous soon enoughmotordavid will become famous soon enough
B/B,
Just from perusing, and not a rigorous rec'd, I found a few zoom teles you/your wife might want to consider. None are the L Glass family,
as I would think you would want Image Stabilization for longer focal length shots, and the L Glass is pricey in some formats.
Not in any order, but they all should work on your Rebel XSi:
-18-200mm
EOS (SLR) Camera Systems - Standard Zoom - Standard Zoom - EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS - Canon USA Consumer Products
-70-300
Amazon.com: Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens + Deluxe Accessory Kit: Electronics

18-135mm:
Amazon.com: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS UD Standard Zoom Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras: Camera & Photo

No Canon xpert, as I barely have my new 40D out of the box, and no Canon
lens maven. My point is a tele much past 135 requires a mono or tripod, or
fast shutter speed and sniper like holding control. And, unless your wife is
into swapping lenses at the blink of an eye, why not go with a compromise
med wide through med tele lens that will "cover" about 90-95% of the shots
you want to capture? And, remember the digital lens multiplier vis a vis the
"capture" vs film cams and lenses, so those longer lengths on even a 135 zoom,
are a pretty long reach.

And, I will quote my initial comment post in this thread:
"Pretty good pics; maybe a future telephoto in your cam bag?"

Cool trip...
GL,mD

Last edited by motordavid; 09-05-2009 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-06-2009, 09:04 AM
E61Silver's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 6,162
E61Silver is an unknown quantity at this point
The 18-200 looks like a good choice, thought I am not sure about optics and the weight.
__________________
Loving my BMW
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-09-2009, 01:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago-burbs
Posts: 297
ravenheart is on a distinguished road
Got the 70-300 mm IS USM lens - haven't shot that much with it yet, but it seems like a good choice for my telephoto lens. Pictures turn out sharp even at 300mm. IS is a life-saver with the lens at longer ranges - at anything higher than 1/100 i consistently get good pictures when zoomed in despite the fact that I shake like a teenage boy confronted by DD's when taking pictures At 70 mm I can go to 1/10.
__________________
- Ravenheart
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-16-2009, 09:20 AM
E61Silver's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 6,162
E61Silver is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by E61Silver View Post
The 18-200 looks like a good choice, thought I am not sure about optics and the weight.
I just got the lens and seems really nice thanks for the advice.
__________________
Loving my BMW
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.