Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 12-11-2009, 03:24 AM
Quicksilver's Avatar
Premier Member and retired relic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 17,184
Quicksilver will become famous soon enoughQuicksilver will become famous soon enough
AT&T Asks Customers in NY, SF to Cut Data Usage

AT&T customers in New York and San Francisco
are experiencing sub-par service and dropped calls
— and now the company wants to put them on a data diet.

Question is are they going to cut the price of their so called
unlimited data plan?

This issue may be coming to a head. If AT&T is going to
expect users to cut Data usage because of their
inability to provide users what they promised then
it would appear that AT&T would be in violation
of their contract with users.

Here's the article;

AT&T Wireless CEO Ralph de la Vega had some bad news for those of us in the New York or San Francisco metro areas. Not only did he acknowledge that AT&T customers in these cities were seeing poor service and all too frequent dropped calls (who knew?!), he said that the biggest data users in these cities would be forced to curtail their network usage.

OK that's a little drastic. According to the WSJ, he said, "Manhattan and San Francisco, particularly the city's financial district, are performing at levels below our standards," and according to the NY Times, "AT&T is considering ways to encourage customers to use less wireless data as its network struggles to keep up with demand".

Whatever. The deal is this (and journalists in SF an NYC have known this for years, why is AT&T only acknowledging this now?):

AT&T, most likely because of the iPhone, can't keep up with demand for wireless data in these two cities. Their grand scheme, after a few years of complaints, is to find a way to curtail the usage of their biggest "data hogs".

Why have a witch hunt when you can just build some more towers or improve the towers that already exist?

I might be missing something - like there is no more spectrum to carry all of the different calls - but I feel like if that were the case, AT&T would have come out and said it.

And, isn't a dense city exactly what a wireless carrier would desire when trying to reach customers for as little as possible? You get the most customers in as tiny an area as possible which could be covered by the least amount of towers. It isn't like the plains where you need to build a tower every few miles for thousands of square miles just to cover a thousand people.

Ralph de La Vega seems confident that these changes will work, but I wonder why, after three years of declining service, we should believe that these latest schemes will help AT&T catch up? Instead, I expect more excuses, distant plans and blaming users from AT&T.

I hope they prove me wrong.

AT&T Asks Customers in NY, SF to Cut Data Usage - PC World
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.”
Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance…….
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.