Ethanol Credit? I hope not anymore

[Naz24]

From WSJ

Looks like we might get lucky and not have to deal with more ethanol in our cars


Senate Backs Repeal of Ethanol Tax Credit .
WASHINGTON—The Senate voted Thursday to repeal a $6 billion tax credit for ethanol producers, a move that could signal the end of some federal subsidies as part of an eventual budget and debt-ceiling compromise.

Most Democrats and a number of Republicans supported an end to the subsidy, in a 73-27 vote. The subsidy gives refiners a 45-cent-a-gallon tax credit for blending ethanol into gasoline and has been a factor behind higher corn prices in recent years. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), a longtime supporter of the credit, objected to the measure that would end the subsidy.

The U.S. ethanol industry is protected by a tariff of 54 cents a gallon on imported ethanol and that, too, would end under the Senate measure.

The ethanol provision was added to unrelated legislation that would renew a program directing federal funding to deprived parts of the country to help local governments attract private investment. Even if approved by the Senate, the legislation isn't expected to be taken up by the House, possibly limiting the vote to symbolic significance.

An earlier vote on ending the ethanol subsidy failed on Tuesday, but that was largely because of Democratic anger at the manner in which the measure was brought to the floor.

The amendment was sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.) who has long pushed for an end to the tax credit.

Senators are now voting on a separate measure that would prevent federal funds from being used for ethanol storage facilities or blender pumps, another attempt at limiting federal support for production of the fuel alternative. That measure is backed by Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.).

[JCL]

How will it make it through the House?

It would be nice though. Food would be cheaper. Fuel would not be artificially subsidized. Government costs would be reduced. And cars would run better. No, it all sounds too logical to be true.

[AzNMpower32]

Originally Posted by JCL

How will it make it through the House?

It would be nice though. Food would be cheaper. Fuel would not be artificially subsidized. Government costs would be reduced. And cars would run better. No, it all sounds too logical to be true.

Common sense and logic are not permitted in the United States, especially when it comes to law-making. I mean, whose bright idea was it to burn food in the first place?

Yesterday when my X3 went in for a suspension overhaul, I had to rent a car to get back home/around town. The Chevy HHR was Flexfuel so I took advantage of the gov't subsidy to fill up at an E85 station for cheap; no kidding, the fuel consumption stinks even with a 1/4 tank of E85.

The only common-sense lawmaking lately has been that NC lawmakers are letting the 1% sales tax increase expire in July.