|
Lovely, Fair & Balanced debate
|
I think they should let Rush or Sean moderate the next one. They will be as unbiased that this woman.
|
The book has been a known factor for months, so I'm not sure what the big deal is," :dunno:
|
Quote:
She is pro and will be fair. |
Quote:
Human nature suggests that she will consciously or unconsciously favor the Omama ticket. She should remove herself as the moderator immediately so as not to taint the debate and she should have never been chosen in the first place. Why you can't see this is beyond me. If the tables were reversed Democrats would be screaming. |
So let's see now....LabGuy
In the book, (which by the way no one has even read yet) Ifill takes a look at the black political movement's beginnings during the Civil Rights movement that gave way "to a generation of men and women who are the direct beneficiaries of the struggles of the 1960s,". Ifill discussed the book in a interview with The Washington Post on September 4, well before the Commission on Presidential Debates announced the debate moderators. The McCain campaign said it had not seen Ifill's Post interview, or been aware of her book, until Tuesday. McCain told CNN's Juan Carlos Lopez that the situation concerned him but that he was sure Ifill would be professional. Now; with that information and the approval of your candidate don't you think you need to relax. At least give your candidate the props for making his own decision as to weather he approves of her or not. You do trust the experience and decision making of Mr. McCain don't you? |
That is fine, can Bill O'Reilly mod the next one.
|
Quote:
The title of the book is "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama," Not much of a Breakthrough if Obama loses now is it... She admits that she did not disclose the book to the debate commission and she is financially tied to the outcome of the election. McCain did about the only thing he can do this late in the game...Hope that the focus is on this issue will force Gwen Ifill will go out of her way to be neutral. That does not make it right. |
Ah my friend, You assume that because of the things you mentioned that she won't be fair and impartial. In doing so you call into question her character.
Where's the evidence in her character that she would be not impartial? You have none. Why not give her the benefit of the doubt? Then make your decision based on her performance. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.