Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   Politics Forum (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/politics-forum/)
-   -   Just Curious (https://xoutpost.com/off-topic/politics-forum/56673-just-curious.html)

Bimmer4125 01-16-2009 09:43 AM

Just Curious
 
Just Curious - who is going to be footing the bill for Messiah O'Bama's mother-in-law to live in the White House? Will she be accorded Secret Service protection? Private chefs? A driver and car? More blind abuse of taxpayers money I guess. "Change"? Don't think so.

4.6is Ryder 01-16-2009 10:05 AM

If she was already living with them, she's considered as part of the immediate family. Plus, this is a great thing for the girls.....that's part of the problem with the youth of the day.....they have no one giving them structure and true guidance. Grandma will be the calming factor in their lives. Or would you rather have secret service chasing drunk and unrulely kids (Bush girls) around the streets.......Phil

Wagner 01-16-2009 10:14 AM

Last I checked, Bush's kids were not in elementary school :rolleyes: Not exactly the same, and who cares if the mother in law goes with him, this isn't a story at all. What will be a story is his failure in the coming years. Maybe he'll bring back Monica Lawinsky with all the other Clinton people :rofl:

It will be interesting go watch Obama's crew show "how" they will really do anything, since they already started back-pedaling.

motordavid 01-16-2009 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bimmer4125
Just Curious - who is going to be footing the bill for Messiah O'Bama's mother-in-law to live in the White House? Will she be accorded Secret Service protection? Private chefs? ...

You are kidding, right?

One "state dinner" for a some corrupt 3rd world country official and his
crooked entourage "costs more" than Obama's m-in-law does for a year.

And, there is a PoliSci Forum for this kind of post, imo.

4.6is Ryder 01-16-2009 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wagner
Last I checked, Bush's kids were not in elementary school :rolleyes: Not exactly the same

First let me just say....I knew you would chime in with something off the wall. Next, there was no comparison between the two sets of kids....the OP's point was about money. So does it cost more to chase losers around town or house grandma....nuff said........Phil

4.6is Ryder 01-16-2009 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by motordavid
You are kidding, right?

One "state dinner" for a some corrupt 3rd world country official and his
crooked entourage "costs more" than Obama's m-in-law does for a year.

And, there is a PoliSci Forum for this kind of post, imo.

:iagree: ......totally

X5Flyboy 01-16-2009 10:38 AM

you want to rant about spending abuse? try remembering the abuse the media gave GW for spending $43 million on his inauguration, now tell me if they will even mention the $150 million Obama's going to spend on his?:rolleyes:

Wagner 01-16-2009 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4.6is Ryder
First let me just say....I knew you would chime in with something off the wall. Next, there was no comparison between the two sets of kids....the OP's point was about money. So does it cost more to chase losers around town or house grandma....nuff said........Phil


There wasn't??? Hmm..you drew the comparison :rofl: You could have simply said "yes, we cover it"

If she was already living with them, she's considered as part of the immediate family. Plus, this is a great thing for the girls.....that's part of the problem with the youth of the day.....they have no one giving them structure and true guidance. Grandma will be the calming factor in their lives. Or would you rather have secret service chasing drunk and unrulely kids (Bush girls) around the streets.......Phil

Wagner 01-16-2009 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by X5Flyboy
you want to rant about spending abuse? try remembering the abuse the media gave GW for spending $43 million on his inauguration, now tell me if they will even mention the $150 million Obama's going to spend on his?:rolleyes:


Drink more kool-aid, this is CHANGE..get with it :rofl:

4.6is Ryder 01-16-2009 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wagner
There wasn't??? Hmm..you drew the comparison :rofl: You could have simply said "yes, we cover it"

If she was already living with them, she's considered as part of the immediate family. Plus, this is a great thing for the girls.....that's part of the problem with the youth of the day.....they have no one giving them structure and true guidance. Grandma will be the calming factor in their lives. Or would you rather have secret service chasing drunk and unrulely kids (Bush girls) around the streets.......Phil

Wags, I was giving a good reason for having grandma around. So let me say this again....would you rather pay for grandma to be a positive influence while in the house or would you rather pay the secret service to chase wild azz teens around town?.............Phil


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.