Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X ///M Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x-m-forum/)
-   -   M vs Non M (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x-m-forum/76249-m-vs-non-m.html)

vitaman 10-07-2010 08:48 AM

M vs Non M
 
For those who have driven both, how much difference is there between the M driven in Normal mode(non Sport, non M) as compared to a top of the line regular X5? (in terms of Acceleration, Handling, and Ride)

Naz24 10-07-2010 11:45 AM

The 50i engine is great in the X5, has a deep growl and lots of power. But in comparison, the M just feels so much faster. The question is, is it worth the extra 20k?

The handling as far as I remember (I drove the X6) was great in both. Unfortunately I didn't really get to test it to the point I'd want to. But either way, both are amazing and can't lose with either.

mswaz 10-07-2010 01:32 PM

No comparison in my opinion. I came from an '08 4.8 X5 and have a lot of time in an X6 50 and in every mode and situation the X5M is far superior. suspension, transmission, steering response, brakes. This is my 5th X5 and absolutely the best hands down. Worth every penny.

The Big Easy 10-07-2010 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mswaz (Post 773247)
No comparison in my opinion. I came from an '08 4.8 X5 and have a lot of time in an X6 50 and in every mode and situation the X5M is far superior. suspension, transmission, steering response, brakes. This is my 5th X5 and absolutely the best hands down. Worth every penny.

:iagree:, cheers

DWill 10-08-2010 12:34 AM

I have both a 10 X5 M Sport and a 10 X5M.

They are both great cars but the M is far, far more car.
Of course the M Sport is a 30 so it's not quite apples to apples.

But still…

Rez 10-08-2010 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWill (Post 773403)
I have both a 10 X5 M Sport and a 10 X5M.

They are both great cars but the M is far, far more car.
Of course the M Sport is a 30 so it's not quite apples to apples.

But still…

There is really no comparison between 3.0 and M as far as drive train is concerned. I did test drive all variety of Xs before getting this one. It is 15k better than 5.0, although this is highly subjective.

DWill 10-08-2010 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rez (Post 773503)
There is really no comparison between 3.0 and M as far as drive train is concerned. I did test drive all variety of Xs before getting this one. It is 15k better than 5.0, although this is highly subjective.

I love both my X's. But there's nothing like driving my X5M.

The 30 X5 M Sport is fun car in it's own right and it's a great daily driver.

x5m-rs4_fan 10-09-2010 12:43 PM

Drive the X5m for 5 minutes, and you will understand why this kind of question isn't even worth asking :)

vitaman 10-09-2010 03:52 PM

I drive my X5M everyday but have never driven any other X5.
My question was predicated on the difference in driving Normal vs Sport mode.
Is the normal 8 Cylinder X5 in Sport mode (I assume it has one) slower and less responsive than X5M in Normal?
The 5 Series GT that I drove for 2 days as a loaner in Sport mode was quicker and more responsive than the X5M in Normal mode.

Naz24 10-09-2010 04:22 PM

So i take back my response, Just drove an X5M today again. and it just really put a huge smile on my face. go for it!

///MB 10-09-2010 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaman (Post 773684)
I drive my X5M everyday but have never driven any other X5.
My question was predicated on the difference in driving Normal vs Sport mode.
Is the normal 8 Cylinder X5 in Sport mode (I assume it has one) slower and less responsive than X5M in Normal?
The 5 Series GT that I drove for 2 days as a loaner in Sport mode was quicker and more responsive than the X5M in Normal mode.

I don't believe the non M X5s have the M driving mode, which basically just makes the accelerator more sensitive. They all have "sport" mode transmission which shifts at higher rpms but the "sport" mode in the X5M is tuned completely differently and is VERY aggressive with lightning fast shifts.

Rez 10-09-2010 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ///MB (Post 773713)
I don't believe the non M X5s have the M driving mode, which basically just makes the accelerator more sensitive. They all have "sport" mode transmission which shifts at higher rpms but the "sport" mode in the X5M is tuned completely differently and is VERY aggressive with lightning fast shifts.

and crazy downshifts

caisson12 10-16-2010 05:17 PM

X5M
 
I just drove the X5M this morning at the BMW Power Tour and still have a S-E Grin on my face.

There is no comparison. Different engine (it uses the 4.4 block but everything else is unique to the X5M), drivetrain, suspension, electronic controls, etc. This X is sick fast and handles great. Still smiling...if you can....go for it!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :thumbup:!!

Jen 10-16-2010 06:28 PM

I think I might be getting mine this week, silverstone/silverstone interior!

ring007 10-16-2010 09:45 PM

Well worth the extra $20k to me. You will come to the same conclusion as soon as you compare them.

paqs 10-17-2010 05:56 AM

I have just changed from an 08 4.8i M Sport to a new X5 M, its like changing from a bus to a sports car.

mtech8 11-10-2010 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rez (Post 773724)
and crazy downshifts

What do u mean by this?

On the fence now on buying my dad a x5 50i or the x5m.

I have an 08 4.8 now. Eats gas like no tomorrow. Average about 13mpg for city and light highway and high 14's when combined with more highway. It's the stoplights that really kill the mpg. In this car, shifting is horrible. So either the 50 or m would be a vast improvement. Driving in ds mode in the 4.8 is uncomfortable. Feels like it keeps it in the wrong gear.

paqs 11-10-2010 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtech8 (Post 780536)
What do u mean by this?

On the fence now on buying my dad a x5 50i or the x5m.

I have an 08 4.8 now. Eats gas like no tomorrow. Average about 13mpg for city and light highway and high 14's when combined with more highway. It's the stoplights that really kill the mpg. In this car, shifting is horrible. So either the 50 or m would be a vast improvement. Driving in ds mode in the 4.8 is uncomfortable. Feels like it keeps it in the wrong gear.

Well my X5 M is one of the many that has developed an engine fault, this happened when it was 2 weeks old and its been stuck in the dealer for the last 2.5 weeks, its been returned 3 times with the same fault and is now stuck in limp mode.

BMW quality control seems to be out the window, also the X5 M uses the S63 engine which is a variant of the N63 in the 50i, any inherent problems may well apply to the 50i as many of the components are the same.

I used to have a 4.8i, it was a great car but drove nothing like the M, I normally drive in manual mode, never liked D or D/S and don't like it on the M either but I would rather have a 4.8i on the road than an M in the shop. Maybe the 8 speed box on the 50i is what you need, just beware of *possible* engine isssues.

mtech8 11-10-2010 06:17 AM

Thanks for the info. I was not aware of the engine issues. Didn't realize that the quality control has been going down. Overall, my 4.8 has been reliable and I just figured that after a few years run quality should be even better.

I test drove the M and the 50i (very gentle test drive). Didn't get a chance to rev the car very high. Lots of traffic on the road. Wasn't exactly sure what mode I was in for the M. Both cars are fast and responsive off the line (much more than my 4.8). So as far as power. Both are more than adequate. It did feel that if I pushed the M it would have been faster than the 50i.

Reasons to get the M:
Overall the experience inside the M was better too. Nicer leather, specially designed "M mode" HUD display (you can switch between this and regular), nicer looking instrument cluster and love the carbon leather. The looks are better than the 50i w/ or w/o the MSport package. Definitely like the wheels on the M better too and the exclusive glossy roof rails (the ones for the MSport package are silver and doesn't go as well with a Black Sapphire as the black ones do) and soft close doors. On top of all that the performance on the M (acceleration and handling) is superior. Plus my dad's never had a M (though he probably couldn't tell the difference between the 50i and the M).

Reasons to get the 50i.
But paying $15K more for these things seems a little pricey. Then factoring in neither a 50i nor a M will be driven to it's potential (my dad is probably just gonna run errands around town and occassionally take a 40 miles freeway trip to see the grand kids at top speed of 80 miles per hour). Plus the difference in mpg between the 50i and M. It almost seems more practical to get the 50i instead.

So to M or not to M.

vitaman 11-10-2010 10:50 AM

Just to balance the equation....My M has had zero problems (well...the ipod cord was a little weak and once the passenger side mirror would not move) and certainly no engine difficulties. It has been more trouble free than the previous Mercedes and Jaguar. I would not let an isolated engine issue be the decider.

chilliwilli 11-10-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaman
Just to balance the equation....My M has had zero problems (well...the ipod cord was a little weak and once the passenger side mirror would not move) and certainly no engine difficulties. It has been more trouble free than the previous Mercedes and Jaguar. I would not let an isolated engine issue be the decider.

Actually...the issues aren't isolated in the least bit. Aside from several members in this forum who are experiencing the usual first year bugs, i have 2 comrades that are almost fed up with engine issues on their 2010 and 2011 M's. One is considering swapping for the Pepper TT even though he'd take a considerable financial hit but says he just can't seem to get over the fugly rear end...and another has had his M in the shop more times than he can recall.

It may very well be first year/model issues however, it's keeping myself and a several other comrades on the fence.

vitaman 11-10-2010 12:25 PM

Did not mean to imply that the problem is not real or devastating.
It's just that all the folks enjoying their X5Ms are not writing in about how they like driving daily to the grocery store, dry cleaners, and Mall.

paqs 11-10-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaman (Post 780592)
Did not mean to imply that the problem is not real or devastating.
It's just that all the folks enjoying their X5Ms are not writing in about how they like driving daily to the grocery store, dry cleaners, and Mall.

Us with engine problems will moan and shout the loudest but look at the number of us that have problems, for the production volume of the X5 M there seem to be an inordinate amount of complaints, many engine related.

I would be happy if mine was an isolated case, it would give me more confidence in the M, alas this is not the case though.

vitaman 11-12-2010 12:49 PM

Hmmmm
Did a Google search for X5M Engine problems.
Saw plenty of recalls and issues on regular X5's. The only references to X5 M (after looking at hundreds of results) were a few topics in Xoutpost.
This to me indicates isolation.

paqs 11-12-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaman (Post 781047)
Hmmmm
Did a Google search for X5M Engine problems.
Saw plenty of recalls and issues on regular X5's. The only references to X5 M (after looking at hundreds of results) were a few topics in Xoutpost.
This to me indicates isolation.

Well that's obvious, seeing as the ratio of X5 Ms to regular X5s will be very small you will always find more complaints about non Ms. In addition to my fault there are others with turbo faults and quite a few with the whiring noise, others with DMTL and fuel pump issues not to mention the chronic stone chipping around the rear quarter which EVERY X5 M suffers from.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.