Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   Programming X5 KMBI/Cluster No Reverse Lights W/Manual Transmission -- SOLVED (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/111347-programming-x5-kmbi-cluster-no-reverse-lights-w-manual-transmission-solved.html)

RocketyMan 01-09-2020 08:04 PM

Programming X5 KMBI/Cluster No Reverse Lights W/Manual Transmission -- SOLVED
 
Hello,

Been a lurker for quite some time. I'm needing some help coding my replacement cluster for a manual transmission as the original apparently died.

Because the replacement used cluster is coded for an auto, the reverse lights don't come on when I shift to reverse.

I used NCS expert to code the replacement cluster and still did not come to any avail. I still get the fault code for no CAN from EGS 1 from the cluster via INPA.

Searching on Xoutpost, I haven't seen much info for E53s and this problem. I did see a good thread on E46 fanatics located here: https://forum.e46fanatics.com/showth...659314&page=17 (hopefully I can post this).


Any help would be MUCH appreciated. I'll follow up with some screenshots with my coding. Thanks again!

RocketyMan 01-10-2020 04:08 PM

2 Attachment(s)
So attached you should see the NCS Expert programming of my modules before.

The KMB SA is: 200000308495180DT, this cluster is the used cluster

The EWS SA is: 200A00308495580FH, this is original to the car.

When I went to code the KMB, I first tried subtracting "8" from the "D" bit and got "5" as the new hex value. In doing so, I still got the "PRND" to remain on the cluster and ultimately, my reverse lights don't respond with the request.

RocketyMan 01-10-2020 05:32 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I think I figured out my problem.

The E46 chassis has the transmission options listed in the SA bits for the coding, but on the E53 they are held in the GM bits. I also confirmed this by looking at the E53ZST file which contains the information of these options, as seen in my picture below.

It was then that I needed to subtract "8" on the GM bit of the 7th digit to get the standard transmission and not "AUTOMATIK" for the proper coding.

NOW, the KMBI (cluster) will expect the reverse light request to come from the standard transmission reverse light switch and NOT the EGS module. Therefore, the KBMI will then send the request to the LCS to activate the reverse lights because now it sees the proper request via standard transmission. In addition, I confirmed this via INPA by reading the codes from the cluster and found the EGS1 no CAN fault now cleared!

Clavurion 01-10-2020 11:56 PM

If ZCS on EWS was still original why didn't you just use that? ZCS itself doesn't do anything. It's just the information used when doing the actual coding and parameter values changed according to ZCS.

RocketyMan 01-11-2020 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clavurion (Post 1175583)
If ZCS on EWS was still original why didn't you just use that? ZCS itself doesn't do anything. It's just the information used when doing the actual coding and parameter values changed according to ZCS.

That's what I ended up doing, was taking the GM, SA, and VN from the EWS and copying it to the KMBI. Now it works as it should.

Is there a way to verify what the original coding was for the car? I suppose I could look up every option on my vehicle, but I'm not sure how to verify every option corresponding to the particular coding. :dunno:

Clavurion 01-11-2020 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocketyMan (Post 1175589)
That's what I ended up doing, was taking the GM, SA, and VN from the EWS and copying it to the KMBI. Now it works as it should.

Is there a way to verify what the original coding was for the car? I suppose I could look up every option on my vehicle, but I'm not sure how to verify every option corresponding to the particular coding. :dunno:

Of course it would have been best to first check that ZCS on EWS and original cluster match so it's accurate. Though ZCS on EWS is likely as it should unless someone has deliberately changed it (or EWS, DME and keys are from another donor vehicle).

Verifying ZCS would mean checking every bit according to vehicle specs and additional equipment. There are some tools like Zeko to help in this if really needed.

Effduration 01-11-2020 08:51 AM

I use PA Soft, NCS, etc and understand ZCS, GM SA and how to program the KMBI.

But does the cluster show the accurate mileage of the original car or the donor car? Does it have a tamper dot? I always thought you needed to solder in a new chip or something to use a used cluster in a different cluster

RocketyMan 01-13-2020 02:25 AM

Sorry for the late reply!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clavurion (Post 1175601)
Of course it would have been best to first check that ZCS on EWS and original cluster match so it's accurate. Though ZCS on EWS is likely as it should unless someone has deliberately changed it (or EWS, DME and keys are from another donor vehicle).

Verifying ZCS would mean checking every bit according to vehicle specs and additional equipment. There are some tools like Zeko to help in this if really needed.

Yes! I tried using Zeko, but the version I have does not run in Win10. :tapping:

I'm trying Zeko version 4.2 and no compatibility settings I used works. But I did try Decode BMW v0.3 and was able to look at my SA options--and they seem reasonable. As for the PO, he said the original cluster was busted and he threw it out. So no luck there.

I'll try to do more digging and find a working version of Zeko.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Effduration (Post 1175603)
I use PA Soft, NCS, etc and understand ZCS, GM SA and how to program the KMBI.

But does the cluster show the accurate mileage of the original car or the donor car? Does it have a tamper dot? I always thought you needed to solder in a new chip or something to use a used cluster in a different cluster

Yes, the used cluster has the tamper dot. And with that I'm curious as to "actual" mileage. I'm not sure I ventured enough in INPA to look at what the EWS says the mileage is. This should be in the "IDENT" function of INPA, ya? I'll need to explore more.

To my understanding, the larger one should be displayed on the cluster and is "checked" every 60 miles or so. It would be great to re-write the vin on the cluster to get rid of the tamper dot as well as the trifecta. But I'm working on getting my ABS module rebuilt hopefully.

Clavurion 01-13-2020 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocketyMan (Post 1175663)
Yes, the used cluster has the tamper dot. And with that I'm curious as to "actual" mileage. I'm not sure I ventured enough in INPA to look at what the EWS says the mileage is. This should be in the "IDENT" function of INPA, ya? I'll need to explore more.

To my understanding, the larger one should be displayed on the cluster and is "checked" every 60 miles or so. It would be great to re-write the vin on the cluster to get rid of the tamper dot as well as the trifecta. But I'm working on getting my ABS module rebuilt hopefully.

Cluster will correct the mileage from LCM's redundant memory only if their VIN matches and cluster has lower mileage than the one in LCM. When the VIN matches tamper dot will also disappear.

Clavurion 01-13-2020 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocketyMan (Post 1175663)
Yes! I tried using Zeko, but the version I have does not run in Win10. :tapping:

I'm trying Zeko version 4.2 and no compatibility settings I used works. But I did try Decode BMW v0.3 and was able to look at my SA options--and they seem reasonable. As for the PO, he said the original cluster was busted and he threw it out. So no luck there.

I'll try to do more digging and find a working version of Zeko.

If there are no reasonable doubts that EWS was changed or hacked and everything seems to work correctly I don't see much point wasting time trying to calculate ZCS again. Zeko and other similar softwares have their flaws and many things should still need to be manually verified.

RocketyMan 01-13-2020 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clavurion (Post 1175668)
If there are no reasonable doubts that EWS was changed or hacked and everything seems to work correctly I don't see much point wasting time trying to calculate ZCS again. Zeko and other similar softwares have their flaws and many things should still need to be manually verified.

I'm not entirely sure the EWS was or was not changed. It would just be nice to actually verify to be certain.

Bmwe5320023.0 09-07-2021 03:22 AM

Hmmm interesting you were able to code ZCS to your cluster.
I replaced the cluster, don't have the tamper dot, but I'm not able to code it to the car, it gives me an error

https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...6#post30725686

https://ibb.co/gScg2w6

Bmwe5320023.0 09-07-2021 03:24 AM

My new cluster thinks the car is 4.4l with air suspension.
However my car is 3.0l with no air suspension and I just want the cluster to display everything correctly without errors

RocketyMan 09-07-2021 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmwe5320023.0 (Post 1209255)
Hmmm interesting you were able to code ZCS to your cluster.
I replaced the cluster, don't have the tamper dot, but I'm not able to code it to the car, it gives me an error

https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...6#post30725686

https://ibb.co/gScg2w6

I would start a new post and reference this one. Maybe I can help assist.

New problem, new car....new thread.

vbelsky 09-07-2021 09:16 PM

Write the following to the IKE/KMBI, EWS, DSC, etc. in NCSExpert:

GM 80130000
SA 200B80100889C80D
VN 0036627AB7

Select "calculate checksum" when you overwrite

Bmwe5320023.0 09-07-2021 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vbelsky (Post 1209291)
Write the following to the IKE/KMBI, EWS, DSC, etc. in NCSExpert:

GM 80130000
SA 200B80100889C80D
VN 0036627AB7

Select "calculate checksum" when you overwrite

Tried but didn't work


https://i.ibb.co/MZrDMZQ/20210907-200244.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/bPfXJKG/20210907-200306.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/cFrq3GX/20210907-200531.jpg
delete duplicate keywords

vbelsky 09-07-2021 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmwe5320023.0 (Post 1209294)
Tried but didn't work

You did it wrong. You need to do ZCS_SCHREIBEN (German for ZCS_WRITE) first, then SG_CODIEREN

Bmwe5320023.0 09-08-2021 09:03 AM

Thanks, I'll give this a try.
Just wondering what's special about your codes?
I used a decoder on your zsc file, and it adds a bunch of modules/options that I don't have in my car and removes Xenon lights, which I do have.

Bmwe5320023.0 09-10-2021 06:23 PM

I tried keeping my numbers.
First command worked, but not the second

https://i.ibb.co/s27gCdN/20210910-160614.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/Lgt86GJ/20210910-160537.jpg

RocketyMan 09-10-2021 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bmwe5320023.0 (Post 1209465)
I tried keeping my numbers.
First command worked, but not the second

https://i.ibb.co/s27gCdN/20210910-160614.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/Lgt86GJ/20210910-160537.jpg

Okay...this is CLEARLY a different problem and perhaps a training/user issue.

Start a new thread and stop hijacking mine.

Michelle 09-10-2021 09:58 PM

Closing this thread per OP's wishes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.