Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   Turbo X5 (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/16547-turbo-x5.html)

dkl 06-14-2006 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adrian.b
Ok I`m probably going to look really thick here but doesnt the X5 3 already have a turbo? Are you talking about an upgrade turbo here?

----
Just answered my own question, yes it does already have one.. here:http://www.realoem.com/bmw/showparts...40&hg=11&fg=50

Your 3.0D should already have a turbo, but Lambeau was talking about the 3.0i (petrol engine), which does NOT have a turbo.

Aimster 06-14-2006 10:07 AM

what is this D?

Lambeau 06-14-2006 10:08 AM

Diesel. I was at Ramstein AFB this past January & I rented a Nissan "Trail" that was a diesel and this thing was actually somewhat quiet and had gobs of power! It sure didn't sound like one of these P.O.S. big diesel fords and dodges that pull up next to you at a stoplight and irritate the shit out of you!

adrian.b 06-14-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkl
Your 3.0D should already have a turbo, but Lambeau was talking about the 3.0i (petrol engine), which does NOT have a turbo.

Right, thanks for the info. I love the gentle whistle when you pull away (from the turbo), but you can only hear it if you have a window down.

vinuneuro 06-14-2006 10:47 AM

The diesel engines are higher stroke, so with reasonable boost pressure from reasonable size turbos, torque gains are substantial. The petrol engines on the other hand have much lower stroke; so one would need to flow much more air, in the form of a large turbo since it's a reasonably larger displacement. Not only is the stock, high compression not suitabe for boost, a larger turbo would mean more lag.

Kelly 06-14-2006 10:49 AM

Why not just find a wrecked M3 with the front-end in tact, and drop that engine in the X5? You would end up with more HP than a 4.4 (but not as much torque), but a much lighter vehicle... Personally, I would just get a 4.4 or a 4.8... That way, you still have a warranty?!?!

-- Kelly

vinuneuro 06-14-2006 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelly
Why not just find a wrecked M3 with the front-end in tact, and drop that engine in the X5? You would end up with more HP than a 4.4 (but not as much torque), but a much lighter vehicle... Personally, I would just get a 4.4 or a 4.8... That way, you still have a warranty?!?!

-- Kelly

M3 engine doesn't have enough torque to pull the weight of the X5. It's power is also more concentrated higher in the rev band relative to the engines offered in the X.

It would def be more practical to get an X5 with a v8.

Lambeau 06-14-2006 10:54 AM

I wanted to get the 4.8 but I WILL NOT drive an automatic! Automatics SUCK! Why couldn't they have put the M3 man trans in the X with the 4.8? I'm sure it could handle the HP/torque.

josh256 06-14-2006 03:54 PM

M3 engine can't pull the X5 but the 3.0i can... ?

But I agree about the high revs - had an '04 M3 and was terrified to drive it a day outside of its warranty.. whereas the torque in the 4.4i is much more noticeable down low.. end result being an engine that doesn't really get pushed all that hard (much better in the long run I expect).

vinuneuro 06-14-2006 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by josh256
M3 engine can't pull the X5 but the 3.0i can... ?

it's about the power + tq band.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.