Quote:
Originally Posted by primetime
I understand this lo jack. But engineering wise? Would you say that Honda and BMW is on the same level?
|
No, they are after two different things.
The short version to me is BMW over engineers in order to deliver performance that (historically, anyway) differeniates their brand. But insodoing, they use a massive amount of consumable parts with comparitively short lives, often creating one or more consumable parts where others, like Honda, would use one non-wear part. That is the tradeoff.
When one buys a BMW, this should be explained to you. That is why things fail at 70k when a Ford/Chev/Mopar equivalent could go 120, 180, 250k.
Granted I have owned this X5 for a bit over a year, but I also still own every other car I have ever owned since I started driving, and they all still run with a minimum amount of repair and replacement. Minus my X5, my fleet average is 174k miles. They are not performance oriented vehicles, or if they were forced into that role, they have been pushed beyond their designs.
I do not think others engineer this way because they do not have to. What performance other manufactueres do achieve is often a sliver of what is possible given the compromise of reliability, low cost of maintainance and so on. It is not a point of contention, well it shouldn't be. It is a different philosphy of running a car company, and it requires those who buy the product to agree, or have a warranty. :rofl:
Ok, no torque. Well, it doesn't take a lot with a light vehicle, and also this is mostly moot if you have a manual gear box, much like an RX8.