![]() |
Quote:
|
Isn't it kinda awkward riding rear-faced?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks! Rob Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah.. she never knew what hit her :) |
I was just thinking, if there are at best 31 inches of headroom and the seat would be at a minimum of 8 or more inches we are left with enough room for a three year old or a short 4 year old at best. Don't forget all the 'stuff' you need to fit back there when you have a new infant!!! Our X5 has a stroller, diaper bag, and errands items (groceries, shopping, etc). We now have 2 children and the back is taken up completely by booster and baby seat. If wife could not take the stroller with her, the car would become useless.
|
Don't forget to suggest/find a cargo area separator so that the kid doesn't get slammed in the head when things shift around.
|
Another thought is a crash impact's effect on the cargo area. They didn't design the crumple zones for people in that area. Even if you can squeeze kids back there, doesn't mean it's safe. Call me old fashioned, but the risk outweighs the reward. I cannot believe someone would even consider adding seats to an area that doesn't have them and stick their kids in there.
Scott |
Quote:
We used to ride in the third row in Vista Cruisers and Ford wagons, and they were fine. Rode in the second row (rear facing) in a Subaru Brat, nothing more than plastic seats mounted in the pickup box, with no rollover protection. This seems much safer than that. I think everybody has to make their own personal decisions. |
I remember how much fun it was to ride facing backwards in a station wagon, but after seeing what can happen in a rear end collision there is no way I'd put my kids in the back of something not designed for having seats.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.