Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   what normally fails in the water pump? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/97972-what-normally-fails-water-pump.html)

stackz 08-13-2014 01:17 PM

what normally fails in the water pump?
 
145k 2001 3.0 vehicle.

I'm going to be doing my oil filter housing gasket in the near future and really thinking of doing the water pump at the same time as I dont know if its original or not.

is it the bearings that give out or the plastic impeller that falls apart?

should I just go with an oem replacement or one with a metal impeller?

I only know of a metal impeller unit from another thread I randomly came across on here months ago and its stuck around in my head but I have no idea who makes it or how much it costs...

tmv 08-13-2014 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stackz (Post 1004905)
145k 2001 3.0 vehicle.

I'm going to be doing my oil filter housing gasket in the near future and really thinking of doing the water pump at the same time as I dont know if its original or not.

is it the bearings that give out or the plastic impeller that falls apart? <-the one on my old 525i has bearings failure, which made some knocking sound. Replace it with new one and the plastic impeller failed a year later. I had Hepu WP with metal impeller in there after that

should I just go with an oem replacement or one with a metal impeller? <-I would go with Hepu or Graf WP with metal impeller

I only know of a metal impeller unit from another thread I randomly came across on here months ago and its stuck around in my head but I have no idea who makes it or how much it costs...

You should look at cooling system overhaul if it has not been done at that mileage.

JCL 08-13-2014 02:40 PM

Water pump failure typically starts with the bearing, on any vehicle with a belt driven water pump. As it gets looser over time (sometimes quickly...) it then takes out the seal, and starts to leak.

The impeller material is a non-issue.

BMW used plastic impellers in some models years ago. They had problems, and stopped using them. No X5 ever had a plastic impeller according to BMW techs on here. The X5 water pump uses a composite impeller, which some mistake for the old plastic one. I would have no concerns using a composite impeller pump. The pumps being promoted with metal impellers are playing on the fear of something that hasn't been an issue since the 1990s. What is important is what the pumping performance of each impeller design is. I don't believe that spec is published by BMW, at least I haven't seen it. So, if you buy other than an OE water pump from BMW you are trusting that it will function as well as the one that was designed for that vehicle, and not just physically fit in the space. That is the best reason to use an OE pump from BMW, and not just one that fits in the space.

Ricky Bobby 08-13-2014 02:53 PM

:iagree: with JCL. I know a member who replaced with aftermarket pump and was not up to the flow characteristic of the OE pump, so he changed it out to EMP Stewart. I would do that one or OE pump

X5SND 08-13-2014 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky Bobby (Post 1004915)
:iagree: with JCL. I know a member who replaced with aftermarket pump and was not up to the flow characteristic of the OE pump, so he changed it out to EMP Stewart. I would do that one or OE pump

LOL. Would that be me Ricky??!?!

I went with the GEBA unit but at extreme cold temps noticed decreased flow at idle (my heat would cool off slightly). The casting edges were crap quality....maybe I got a bad unit, who knows. Slapped in a stewart pump and all has been well since. I think it also comes with a lifetime warranty if my memory serves me right.

Quicksilver 08-14-2014 03:07 AM

Sorry but this is funny,

I'm in the club of if it ain't broke don't fix it. When it brakes replace it with the proper part. It may last another 145K but who really cares weather it's bearings or the impeller? No one is going to just replace bearings or an impeller. What ever goes wrong, if it stops working your gonna replace the whole thing correct?:D


Quote:

Originally Posted by stackz (Post 1004905)
145k 2001 3.0 vehicle.

Really thinking of doing the water pump at the same time as I dont know if its original or not.

is it the bearings that give out or the plastic impeller that falls apart?

should I just go with an oem replacement or one with a metal impeller?

I only know of a metal impeller unit from another thread I randomly came across on here months ago and its stuck around in my head but I have no idea who makes it or how much it costs...


Jungerishere 08-14-2014 07:16 AM

:iagree:

Plastic impeller problem was in M50, S50, M52, and S52 engines, not M54 engines. Stick with OE with composite impeller. Aftermarket metal impeller is heavier than composite and can led to quicker bearing failure. Also, heavier metal impeller uses more horsepower since it requires more effort to move the heavier part.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCL (Post 1004914)
Water pump failure typically starts with the bearing, on any vehicle with a belt driven water pump. As it gets looser over time (sometimes quickly...) it then takes out the seal, and starts to leak.

The impeller material is a non-issue.

BMW used plastic impellers in some models years ago. They had problems, and stopped using them. No X5 ever had a plastic impeller according to BMW techs on here. The X5 water pump uses a composite impeller, which some mistake for the old plastic one. I would have no concerns using a composite impeller pump. The pumps being promoted with metal impellers are playing on the fear of something that hasn't been an issue since the 1990s. What is important is what the pumping performance of each impeller design is. I don't believe that spec is published by BMW, at least I haven't seen it. So, if you buy other than an OE water pump from BMW you are trusting that it will function as well as the one that was designed for that vehicle, and not just physically fit in the space. That is the best reason to use an OE pump from BMW, and not just one that fits in the space.


Ricky Bobby 08-14-2014 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by X5SND (Post 1004958)
LOL. Would that be me Ricky??!?!

I went with the GEBA unit but at extreme cold temps noticed decreased flow at idle (my heat would cool off slightly). The casting edges were crap quality....maybe I got a bad unit, who knows. Slapped in a stewart pump and all has been well since. I think it also comes with a lifetime warranty if my memory serves me right.


Yes S would be the one lol!

And that is why I recommend OE pump or EMP Stewart pump, not the others for M54 and the other E53 models.

tmv 08-14-2014 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jungerishere (Post 1004992)
Plastic impeller problem was in M50, S50, M52, and S52 engines, not M54 engines.

You should have told that to the one I put in my old E39 525i :nanana: :bustingup One spirited driving on a hot summer day then the car was overheated. The impeller was separated from the rest of the WP.

cn90 08-14-2014 10:58 AM

Impeller is a big issue in early BMWs built in the 1990s and early 2000s.
They used composite impeller to save weight (yeah, save 2 ounces out of 4500 lbs!!!).
These impellers break all the time.

The bearing, if it fails, is a result of mileage > 140K and/or seal failure, no matter what brand of water pump you are talking about.

Listen to tmv, do a cooling overhaul. Tons of info in E39 forum.

If you don't have money for cooling overhaul, then watch the coolant level once a week etc. and don't take the car on long distance trips.

Cooling overhaul is about $500-$600 in parts.

I am a person who believes "if not broken, don't fix it" but cooling system is the exception. For cooling system, I'd day "if not broken, and if you have > 140K miles, fix it before it is too late".

PS: I use HEPU Water Pump since May 2006, zero issues.

StephenVA 08-14-2014 11:05 AM

+1 on the water pump brands- OE or Stewart only.

Water pumps will tell you they are going bad LONG before they throw up and croak. As the bushing fails (no bearings in OE pumps and 90% of all replacement units- search "Stewart hi flow water pumps" for true bearing tech info http://www.stewartcomponents.com/ind...tegory&path=84) the shaft will have play allowing for seal failure. The play can be detected by grabing the fan blades and pushing back and forth towards the engine. The seal failure is obvious when you find your X5 pees on the garage/ parking space after driving, or you find green/blueish stains just below the casting and pulley.

In the case of many BMW engines with the older plastic part material, the trick is/was to replace everything in the cooling system at 60,000 miles as preventive repairs(rad, thermostat housings, overflow tanks, upper and lower rad hoses, W/P, belts, misc heater hoses, etc). Cooling system parts just fail under pressure due to age/mileage. The plastic Rads would just blow off the side tanks the first time you hit the highway. Water pumps drop off the early plastic impeller, and the fan would exit into the rad, fans blades explode, etc. All events would cook the engine before you could find a pull off.:wow: This is why everyone posts, REPLACE EVERYTHING when doing a cooling system update, on BMWs.

Do you need to? The simple answer is No, with the following legal disclaimer: Do you look under the hood of your vehicle and KNOW what to look for? If not, then EARLY Preventive Maintenance will be your best option to have a great reliable relationship with your X5. There have been many examples of high mileage cars with no issues. Others in stop and go traffic (is there any other kind?), throw up/out cooling system parts long before 100K.

Almost everything in our vehicles will tell you as they go bad. Except electrical ones. They just stop working one morning or drop dead in the middle of working...:p:

Now back to work....

Rockit 08-14-2014 11:08 AM

Water pump failures on ALL Bm's are the most common regardless of what fails indise the pump. It WILL fail.

They can wipe out your engine and alternator if water cooled. It will fail while on traffic with no shoulder in the poring rain at night.

I paid $1,000 to have the dealer do it at 88k for just the precaution. Once installed at the dealer it has a lifetime warrantee and will also cover most residual damaged if fails.

cn90 08-14-2014 12:47 PM

In the M52/M54 engine, the WP may or may not give any warning before going south.
- If it leaks from the front seal, then yes, you will see coolant dripping.
- If the impeller flies apart at high rpm, then no, absolutely no warning at all, other than a temp gauge pegging all the way to the right in the red zone!

On the issue or brand: OE, is OK but watch for composite impeller, personally I stay away from BMW WP.
- Stewart is good but no better than HEPU, plus Stewart is overpriced.

I have had my HEPU water pump in my 1998 528i (M52) now for 8 years, zero problems. The Volvo people use HEPU all the time.

If people want the best bang for their bucks, stick to HEPU.

The above statement is true for I6 engine.

V8 is another animal.

JCL 08-14-2014 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmv (Post 1005013)
You should have told that to the one I put in my old E39 525i :nanana: :bustingup One spirited driving on a hot summer day then the car was overheated. The impeller was separated from the rest of the WP.

That sounds like it failed right after installation. If so, that is a classic case of infant mortality. A new pump is simply more likely to fail than an old pump, due to the number of early hour failures we see. It isn't necessarily a design problem, as you suggest, but usually a manufacturing problem. People don't realize that when they attempt to do PMs and replace components that are running well, they are trading off risks. There is more risk of an immediate failure, in exchange for a likelihood that it will go longer (over the medium term) to failure.

Of course, your old pump may have failed and you had no choice. But for those considering a precautionary water pump replacement.....

PM practice has moved on a long way from simply replacing components based on time and mileage. Modern PM practice includes managing the consequences of failure. I have never changed my water pump (now at 100,000 km on the X3) because I know it will be more reliable than a new one. However, I am tuned to watching the temperature gauge and know what the results of running the engine hot are.

I am referring here to rotating components and mechanical wear. The expansion tank is a different issue: if there are signs that it has hardened over time then replacing it can be cheap insurance. But that hardening has little to do with total miles on the vehicle, it has more to do with the environment the vehicle was operated in and the nature of the thermal cycles it has experienced.

Ricky Bobby 08-14-2014 02:26 PM

Checking Cam's reference of the HEPU pump, doth my eyes deceive me?

Made in Germany???

http://c1552172.r72.cf0.rackcdn.com/285133_x600.jpg

rayxi 08-14-2014 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCL (Post 1005049)
... because I know it will be more reliable than a new one.

What is your rationale for that statement considering you would likely replace it with an BMW water pump that is the same as the old one? I think the risk of a manufacturing defect in the new pump is low compared to the risk of wear on the old one.

tmv 08-14-2014 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCL (Post 1005049)
That sounds like it failed right after installation...

About a year later, not right after installation.

StephenVA 08-14-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky Bobby (Post 1005051)
Checking Cam's reference of the HEPU pump, doth my eyes deceive me?

Made in Germany???

http://c1552172.r72.cf0.rackcdn.com/285133_x600.jpg

I have this one installed in a 528 now going on 5 years. No problems what so ever.
The OE W/P plastic impleller was hanging on with a thread when pulled out at 61K.

JCL 08-14-2014 03:26 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by rayxi (Post 1005052)
What is your rationale for that statement considering you would likely replace it with an BMW water pump that is the same as the old one? I think the risk of a manufacturing defect in the new pump is low compared to the risk of wear on the old one.

Okay, sorry if this is a little long.

That is the classical assumption that drove many preventative maintenance practices for decades. In some cases it is true. But in many cases, not true.

Here is a summary that I didn't write, but which describes the practices we used for years in very complete, professionally managed, long term equipment maintenance contracts.

Quote:

OLD PARADIGM

Most equipment becomes more likely to fail as it gets older

NEW PARADIGM

Most failures are not more likely to occur as equipment gets older

For decades, conventional wisdom suggested that the best way to optimize the performance of physical assets was to overhaul or replace them at fixed intervals. This was based on the premise that there is a direct relationship between the amount of time (or number of cycles) equipment spends in service and the likelihood that it will fail, as shown in Figure 2. This suggests that most items can be expected to operate reliably for a period "X", and then wear out.

Classical thinking held that X could be determined from historical records about equipment failure, enabling users to take preventive action shortly before the item is due to fail in future. This predictable relationship between age and failure relationship is indeed true for some failure modes. It tends to be found where equipment comes into direct contact with the product. Examples include pump impellers, furnace refractories, valve seats, crusher liners, screw conveyors, machine tooling and so on. Age-related failures are also often associated with fatigue and corrosion.

However, equipment in general is much more complex than it was even fifteen years ago. This has led to startling changes in the patterns of equipment failure, as shown in Figure 3. The graphs show conditional probability of failure against operating age for a wide variety of electrical and mechanical items.

Pattern A is the well-known bathtub curve, and pattern B is the same as Figure 2. Pattern C shows slowly increasing probability of failure with no specific wear-out age. Pattern D shows low failure probability to begin with then a rapid increase to a constant level, while Pattern E shows a constant probability of failure at all ages. Pattern F starts with high infant mortality and drops eventually to a constant or very slowly increasing failure probability.
I have attached two charts from this article, below. Most expect that failure modes look like Pattern A. But from one study:

Quote:

Studies on civil aircraft showed that 4% of the items conform to pattern A, 2% to B, 5% to C, 7% to D, 14% to E and no fewer than 68% to pattern F. (The distribution of these patterns in aircraft is not necessarily the same as in industry, but as equipment grows more complex, more and more items conform to patterns E and F.)

These findings contradict the belief that there is always a connection between reliability and operating age - the belief which led to the idea that the more often an item is overhauled, the less likely it is to fail. In practice, this is hardly ever true. Unless there is a dominant age-related failure mode, fixed interval overhauls or replacements do little or nothing to improve the reliability of complex items.
(my emphasis)

So what can happen with changing components out when they are working fine? Look at the second picture. In the case of TMV, I was asking if the second failure was soon after the replacement, which would put it in the more likely phase. Turns out it wasn't, it went a year. But you have to get through that early phase before you get to a phase that is essentially the same probability as an older pump (depending on the slope of the line as time extends out). There is obviously a limit to how long it goes. But to say that all pumps fail at 100,000 is not supported by the data. That is just a convenient round number at which a number of people think changing the pump is a good idea. And some of those changes will result in a failure soon after, because a great number of components have higher infant mortality rates than mid-life failure rates.

We should also distinguish between raw data about component failure rates (represented in the charts) with the additional failures caused by interventions. Even when done correctly (right fluids, right torques, right part, no contamination) we will see failure rates like the raw data. But add in the risk of intervention, and early failures are much more likely. When we used to calculate heavy duty diesel engine life for replacements (typically every 15,000 hours for a 60,000 hour contract) we would on average not see the same 15k interval on the second, third, or fourth life. That is partly due to ancillary systems not being changed out at the same time and causing some subsequent failures, and partly due to the failures due to the intervention itself.

Since we are on water pumps, there is a classic failure mode for mechanically driven water pumps (more so prior to the adoption of belt tensioners). A shop would change the belts, which wore regularly. They would sometimes over tension them. The pump would fail soon after. And the customer would say, gee, what a drag, and I just got new belts too. Happened so often it was predictable. If the belts were tensioned correctly, the pumps ran a very long time.

Obviously, things wear out. But simply replacing components without real data on when they wear out, and the resultant consequences of failure, it not cost effective. I suggest that with BMW cooling systems we have little real data on when they wear out. Look at the urban myths around plastic impellers, which people all seem to know about but which never applied to the E53. But at the same time, we have a strong sense of the consequences being high when a component fails suddenly, and owners continue to operate the vehicle while it overheats. It happens too often. So the change outs are driven more by the consequences, not an informed decision about the likelihood.

I have posted this or similar articles before. This particular one (which contains the above quotes) is here for those interested:
Maintenance Management

Jeff

cn90 08-14-2014 03:49 PM

Yes, HEPU WP is made in Germany. Very quality stuff.
I have had it in my 1998 528i (same water pump as X5 3.0) since May 2006, Zero issues.

60K miles (100K kilometers) is still early.
Personally, I'd do cooling overhaul every 10y/90K or so.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.