Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E70) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/)
-   -   2007 X5(E70)...Is 3.0i Too Weak? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/21499-2007-x5-e70-3-0i-too-weak.html)

nowstime 10-17-2006 10:22 PM

2007 X5(E70)...Is 3.0i Too Weak?
 
Hi~

I'm dying to be a BMW owner...but can't decide my mind...

I'm willing to invent around $45,000~$50,000 including tax and title..Drive out...

The new X5 looks stunning but with my budget...I can only afford a 3.0i...

Is the new in-line 260hp enough for the heavy X5?

Or should I go for a pretty loaded X3 which also has the new V6 260hp engine?


Thanks...

cue03 10-17-2006 10:24 PM

Good question.

LeMansX5 10-17-2006 10:29 PM

I am sure HP is enough. If you have never driven a BMW, you should test drive one and decide for yourself. BMW's are drivers car.

vinuneuro 10-17-2006 11:00 PM

Wait 6 months past X5 official production release and buy a 4.8i.

fiber46is 10-18-2006 01:40 AM

Well, there's a lot of current models with 3.0i engine on the roads and I quess they are satisfied. It's a matter of how much performance you want. New model is heavier, but it has a lot better engine having more torque especially in low rpm and also a lot more HP than current model and when you hook that to better transmission I think E70 will be better. I'm also considering of bying the 3.0si instead of trading my 4.6is to 4.8i, that would be a family car with more space and softer suspension ;)

AzNMpower32 10-18-2006 02:41 PM

I think the X5 3.0si will be adaquate. It's not going to be blisteringly fast or as fast as a lighter X3 3.0si, but keep in mind you are driving an SAV, not a 3-series. The engines have good low end torque and a 6-speed auto to keep it in the powerband. By the way if you don't know, the 2007 X3 and X5 3.0si use the same engine, a 3 liter inline-6 (not a V6).

blondboinsd 10-18-2006 03:56 PM

I always thought the X5 3.0i was fine, I have had two of them and friends who had the 4.4i, I have owned a High performance suv (SC RR) and found it not that much better, I don't floor it from red lights or anything or use it to race but for freeway and city driving its just for me, it really comes down to indivigual driving style.

colonels 10-18-2006 05:54 PM

i have the 3.0 2003 X5 and i also had a Porsche CaymanS.
0-60 times for are 8.3 and 5.5 respectively. Porsche obviously feels quicker off the line.
Top speed is 125mph and 177mph. Never broke 120mph in either.

X5 is not a sports car. The simple fact that you ride so much higher than a Porsche gives you the feeling that you are moving slower. The lower down to the ground you are, the faster you feel.

I would have to check my speedo on the exact same highways to make sure that I was going 80mph in the X5 (which I was but felt way slower) while in my Porsche I felt dangerously fast at the same 80mph.

3.0 is enough for me, but I guess if I wanted more performance/less mpg then the 4.8 would be a good single car that encompasses speed and comfort and room and safety for roughly $7000 more

LeMansX5 10-18-2006 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colonels
i have the 3.0 2003 X5 and i also had a Porsche CaymanS.
0-60 times for are 8.3 and 5.5 respectively. Porsche obviously feels quicker off the line.

not an apples to apples comparison though. 650i maybe;)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.