![]() |
Quote:
2) The restriction in the stock intake is negligible. 3) Aftermarket CAIs commonly take their air, paradoxically, from under the hood. Those that do are in fact hot air intakes, despite the marketing labels attached to them. |
Quote:
I just wanted to know why there seemed to be a blanket "not worth it statement." Thanks |
I honestly like the extra bit of engine sound from them when u put ur foot down
I had an AFE one on my 3series and although I'm sure there wasn't much, if any HP increase it sounded great |
Quote:
Actually that is not true- at least the assertion that somehow trubo versus non-turbo impacts the question. If a car has an intake that sucks warm air, then a system that sucks cooler air will be a benefit. HOW MUCH of a benefit depends on (1) how much cooler, and (2) how much more resistance (static pressure) the CAI creates. Just becuase a mfg calls something a "cold air intake" does not make it true. They toss up a cooked dyno, and people plunk down $$ becuase they like the sound.... Quote:
Also, could you explain how a cold air intake changes the 'intercooler body temperature'.... to change the IC temp you need to have an air-to-air IC AND change the airflow into the intercooler, or make the intercooler more efficient. On turbo cars, changing to "less restrictive" air filters/intakes usually does nothing, as the turbo can pull as much air as it needs (generally they are dumping/limiting the pressure anyway). An NA car WILL benefit from less restriction as it will use all the air it can get, but most facotry systems are already pretty well designed. Anyway, unfortunately nobody will put the engineering effort into blueprinting the X5 for tune, intake, etc, etc....you'll find shops that toss half-assed stuff out, but a careful mapping (a la Dinan) will not be done- no market. IMO |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.