Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E70) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/)
-   -   MPG change when upgrading to 20"? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/97120-mpg-change-when-upgrading-20-a.html)

jinhao 05-17-2014 07:10 PM

MPG change when upgrading to 20"?
 
looking to upgrade our 19" wheels to 20" along with the fender flares... Not going to run staggered as I want to be able to rotate the tires. (i'll just run spacers in the back)

for those of you who upgraded, did you notice a decrease in MPG? Love our 35d and would hate to lose the MPG just for some aesthetics.

14thbmw 05-17-2014 08:08 PM

There shouldn't be any change if the width is the same, assuming you don't change you driving style.

ard 05-17-2014 09:34 PM

Even if the width changes, the impact should be in the noise...imo

Diameter is all the same, so no change in force/torque/rpm/efficiency

JCL 05-17-2014 10:54 PM

There should be a negative impact due to increased rotational inertia, unless you never stop or start. I'd expect it to be small, though.

ard 05-17-2014 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCL (Post 994727)
There should be a negative impact due to increased rotational inertia, unless you never stop or start. I'd expect it to be small, though.

Yeah, but no more then 3 or 4 mpg, right?

hd2000fxdl 05-18-2014 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JCL (Post 994727)
There should be a negative impact due to increased rotational inertia, unless you never stop or start. I'd expect it to be small, though.

LOL, that's assuming he's going OWM Wheels, what if he's going to replica wheels and from RFT to Non-RFT and lower the overall weight, I'll leave the math to you.. LOL

Oh don't forget, fender flares, additional drag.. :bustingup

Harry

Price 05-18-2014 08:35 AM

With OEMs/run flats the drop would probably be 1..2 MPG.
My beyern/non run flats combo is lighter than stock 18s, and MPG remained exactly the same.

jinhao 05-18-2014 10:36 AM

rotational mass remains the same but i'm going from 255/50R19 to 275/40R20. I know it already has more area in front of the wheel when it comes to aerodynamics but such a big car I don't know if its that significant.

3-4mpg is a pretty significant difference.....

14thbmw 05-18-2014 11:02 AM

Rolling resistance is probably more important than aero for the tires themselves. Wider patch implies more resistance. I think it is pretty hard to drive the same on tires that handle better - I'm guessing there is some right foot action that outweighs mass, rolling resistance and aero combined!

hd2000fxdl 05-18-2014 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 14thbmw (Post 994760)
Rolling resistance is probably more important than aero for the tires themselves. Wider patch implies more resistance. I think it is pretty hard to drive the same on tires that handle better - I'm guessing there is some right foot action that outweighs mass, rolling resistance and aero combined!

Now the truth comes out.. :iagree:
Harry


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.