View Single Post
  #7  
Old 04-03-2007, 01:29 AM
Eric5273's Avatar
Eric5273 Eric5273 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,458
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by statdoc
I am so surprised by your opinion.
Just an informed opinion based on history.

What history has shown us is that when something is suspected of being unhealthy by the experts, it almost always is, and those who fight against that opinion are usually those who are financially hurt by such findings.

This was the case with the cigarettes, asbestos, lead paint, radiation, perchlorate, and probably dozens more I cannot think of at the moment.

In all of those cases, the scientific community was united in saying these things were unhealthy, but industry always produced "experts" with studies that showed these things were not unhealthy. The end result was a media reporting to the public that there was no consensus on the matter. Then years later, we find out that these "experts" were being paid to lie by those in industry that they represented. Big surprise there.

Yes, it's possible that cell phone towers are not unhealthy. But I personally would not be willing to bet on it with my own health. Feel free to do that with your own though.
__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links