Quote:
|
Originally Posted by isdeleon
|
For every site you can post, I can easily post a site with the opposite stats. The point is, many CIVILIANS have been killed even after the death of Saddam and the start of this war.
There are issues all over the world that Bush does not seem to be interested in. He only started to mention Africa in the last year. There is civil war and unjust everywhere. The purpose of Iraq was to find Bin Laden right?The president used an American tragedy for his own selfish purposes. Like Wagner said.. what's up with Afghanistan?
Ok, so by your math posted 600,000 killed over 24 years.
By my math posted there are different numbers.. 20,000 killed in 2003.. Lets say the war started in 2002 (9/11 was 2001).
so in 1 year, 20k - its been 6=120k.
so 120k per 6 yrs. So this is on pace for 120k times 4 (24yrs divided by 6yrs=4). So this war is on pace to have a civilian body count of 480,000.
All the #s are estimated - so maybe it isn't more than Saddam - but we can probably say that both estimates are close in terms of death toll.
Anyway.. onto the "link rebuttal"
http://www.antiwar.com/ips/lobe111303b.html
http://www.time.com/time/columnist/k...933405,00.html
http://www.4ni.co.uk/news.asp?id=22263 (Nov 11 2003 - 20,000)
__________________
--
2005 LeMans Blue e53 4.8is
MODs
///LeMans Blue RBs///Intravee II///Sirius///ACS Spoiler///AiB v3///HID Fogs///LED Tails///
///215 20" Ferric Gray///MTEC Pedals///DVD Headrests///SMG M Wheel///AFE CAI Stage 2


