Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MrLabGuy
For starters I'd like to see you in the World spotlight after being coached for hours on what to say and not to say in interviews. Her IQ has very little to do with her performance in that particular interview.
Secondly, your generic and uninformed statement about the trooper is just that. Do some homework and try not to repeat what others say who are just as uninformed about the specific details. I'm not going to do your homework for you.
|
No, you probably wouldn't like to see that...

I am, however, in a position that requires me to be flexible, think on my feet, offer solutions and leave the people I deal with happy and satisfied. Before taking the job, I did a lot of internal speculation as to whether it is a reality for me or not. The Co. I work for considered it a priority as well.
Here is the crux:
Should not our VP be quick witted, and able to control a situation with their knowledge and intellectual view point on the subjects at hand? It appeared to me, that she was not in control of her information and struggled at times. (This is to be expected, and these situations can be handled positively) The overall impression she left with me was one of concern and not confidence.
The reality is, she is in a position to be scrutinized. Being prepared (mentally and factually) as well as having the awareness to handle it should be a prerequisite. Does that not relate to IQ? Or does it relate simply to social skills and experience?
It is scary to compare the performance of Clinton, Nixon and Kissinger to that of Palin.
On the Trooper. I was listening to this being discussed on the local NPR station and pretty much to it for fact. I will look into it further.