View Single Post
  #17  
Old 12-21-2005, 09:17 PM
alpac's Avatar
alpac alpac is offline
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Durham NC USA
Posts: 3,075
alpac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiCkEy
Becuz there is NO agitator the front loaders, they are actually softer on the clothes. Also I yet to have find a new model that does not let you add clothes midway into a cycle. Expensive yes but they are very efficient machines. With a DC motor (less electricity, high RPM rinses) and low water usage they do save a lot for you. The Dryer I have has the same capacity as the largest dryer there is matched with a top loader and works great. The Front loader is 3.7 cu. ft..lots of space and is NOT small.

Times have changed for the front loaders. Some one also mentioned the front loaders leaking. They were specific Maytag models that had the angled drums and the water was never rinsed completely. Mildew was another problem. This is 2-3 years back and Maytag got sued to.
Agree, the front loaders are a lot softer with clothes and save on electricity but the price difference is significant. In my opinion a front loader is a better choice for a family of 4 or more but in your case I would go cheap. Two loads a week is not enough to justify the price difference.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links