Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL
Too easy. You will like this source. A doctor of infectious diseases. Working for no profit on this web site, simply combatting quackery. I like his point that if he was in it for the money, he would make more money during outbreaks. Healthy people aren't the business opportunity for doctors that sick ones are. So leave big business out of it.
By way of introduction, Amanda Peet said in public that people who didn't vaccinate their kids were parasites. The post is well worth reading.
Oh, and the chemicals you mention? Some of them are preservatives. None of them are harmful in the dosages in question. But more important is the downside of not vaccinating children. Read on. All the proof you want. With references and citations.
Science-Based Medicine » Amanda Peet is My Hero(1)
Check that website for articles on the non-linkage to autism.
If you are all for critical thinking, you will likely be ashamed of your previous posts on not vaccinating children. |
OK, I will look into Amanda Peet and the link you provided.
But, you have to look at:
Merck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hilleman admitted presence of SV40, AIDS and cancer viruses in vaccines
In case you didn't like the natural news link above, although it looks credible to me...maybe this one below is better suited?
Leading Vaccine Doctor States Cancer Linked to Polio Vaccine
After seeing that link, wouldn't critical thinking lead you to really question big pharma? I sure do.
Back to Dr. Blaylock, why is it that no one will take Dr. Blaylock up on studying the Amish children that haven't been vaccinated and compare children that have been vaccinated?
Seems a slam dunk for pro-vaccination, right? So, why aren't there any takers?
Did you watch that short 15 minute video I posted earlier? I found it odd and it does leave questions...in my mind anyway and I suppose in others as well.