1) I have yet to see you track anything.
2) STI more tuneable front to rear bias which is not available in US EVO's.
3) compared to what??? slaloms are not true tests.
4) you're talking about a daily driver...
5) It did not dominate the WC series. Plenty of other cars were faster than the realtime racing guys... It was btw a stupid series with questionable drivers. If these guys were any good, they wouldn't be driving that series.
I would just stfu... coming from a fool who only has real prelude experience, you're in no position to talk...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vinuneuro
Pleease..you're the one that sounds like you've driven only the Sti and making the comparison. The Evo is great, much better than the Sti just considering how they both handle. Much much direct and raw. Evo handles better, but Sti has more low-end pull, better interior, much better souding engine. Tough compromise. Doesn't change the fact that every kid owns one though.
Lmao, when MT tested the ITR, it was faster through the slalom than every car they had ever tested except the Viper GTS, F355 and 911T.. wrong wheel drive my ass. I also recall it dominating the WC Series for a few seasons.
|