Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E53) Forum
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-29-2015, 08:52 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 25
terminx is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcredliner View Post
Unless you relieve some back pressure the headers will do very little for performance. As I mentioned, headers won't deliver much change in sound. The cheaper and more effective way to reach your goal is to modify the exhaust. That will improve performance some and get you a different sound. I don't know how or if you can make it sound deeper. I have done no exhaust work on a 3.0.
Unfortunately, the only part of this post that is correct is the part where you admit you have no experience with the M54 engine. Headers are worth 10-20 hp at the wheels--depending on the particular headers and other engine mods--but modifying the rest of the exhaust does virtually nothing for performance here without removing the massive airflow restriction that is the OEM exhaust manifold. The collectors are very restrictive. They're designed to be quiet and lower emissions, nothing more.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #22  
Old 11-30-2015, 12:44 AM
bcredliner's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Little Elm,Texas. (40 minutes North of Dallas)
Posts: 8,108
bcredliner is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminx View Post
Unfortunately, the only part of this post that is correct is the part where you admit you have no experience with the M54 engine. Headers are worth 10-20 hp at the wheels--depending on the particular headers and other engine mods--but modifying the rest of the exhaust does virtually nothing for performance here without removing the massive airflow restriction that is the OEM exhaust manifold. The collectors are very restrictive. They're designed to be quiet and lower emissions, nothing more.

I am unclear as to your point. You mention 10-20 hp improvement but then you qualify that with depending on the headers and the tune. There was no tune or well engineered headers in the equation. Exhaust manifolds are not designed to reduce sound or control emissions and certainly are part of the performance goals. Where does that come from?

I didn't say I was unfamiliar with the N54 engine. I said I did not know how the sound would change with headers but it wouldn't matter if I were not familiar with the N54.

My input is based on the universal benefits of an engine (a big air pump) from exhaust modifications. Stock exhaust systems downstream of exhaust manifolds restrict exhaust flow. That being the case any airflow benefit of headers will be lost without relieving the back pressure. Headers attached to a stock exhaust won't result in more air in because it can't get out.

Open headers would allow more out and an increase in HP though unless they are well engineered that can easily be a loss of TQ resulting in a longer time to go from A-B.

The higher the engine RPMs the more air is drawn in and pumped out. Open headers will allow more air out but unless the red line is increased the benefit is still minimal.

Since OP wants sound and performance but I don't get the impression he wants to get radical or spend thousands of dollars, my suggestion is to add a tune that increases the redline and improves HP and TQ. Modify the exhaust with low restriction mufflers, remove the resonators and enjoy. Time and dollars saved and more HP/TQ and better sound than just headers. However, I get the impression performance is secondary to sound. If that is the case I would just do the exhaust work and see if that met the goal. Since exhaust modifications can get loud quick and create a drone, might want to do exhaust mods in stages.
__________________
X5 4.6 2002 Black Sap, Black interior. 2013 X5M Melbourne Red, Bamboo interior
Dallas

Last edited by bcredliner; 11-30-2015 at 01:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-30-2015, 01:49 AM
Joshdub's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,065
Joshdub is on a distinguished road
The M54s headers are cats, so aftermarket headers delete the cats. The rest of the exhaust system isn't all that restrictive.
__________________
03 3.0i mt
89 325is
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-30-2015, 04:39 AM
Green Dragon's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 337
Green Dragon is on a distinguished road
Time to help out....

Hello my fellow e53 brothers. It's been a while. Having installed headers on my 3.0, however anecdotal, the old butt dyno felt quite a difference in performance and the sound is just shaweeeeet. The stock exhaust manifold with integrated cats is not optimal for performance. Bmw crammed the cats up high and close to the heat as possible to get them up to temp faster, to help make the m54 ULEV. I've posted picsl/vids in my other threads. They're quite compromised. I've also ran with open headers for a few days. There seems to be a loss of torque down low, but mid range and top end was awesome. Once I hooked the rest of the exhaust up, it was better down low and pulled much harder all the way to red line.

Just a note. I had shark injector software w/ the 7 k red line, modified exhaust with oem center muffler/resonator in place, and rear muffs replaced with some magna flow resnators welded in.

My X gets inspected this week, and then my headers are being installed soon on my current e53. I was going to do it over the summer, but I wanted some time to sort out aftermarket cats and Euro 2 software tune to delete out the post O2's.
__________________
2005 X5 3.0, 6MT, Alpine White on Truffle Brown, Sport, Preim, and Cold Weather, Alpina Stainless Headers, AFe Intake, UUC SSK, OEM 87's, 3.64 Differential Swap,Performance Modified Euro 2 Tune, UUC LTW Flywheel and HD clutch, Bilstein B12 Suspension kit
Future mods ZHP/Schrick Cam Shaft upgrade, Operation code name:Doppelschrauben-Kompressor

Wife's Ride: 2011 e70 X5 351 M///Sport.

Also in the fold: 2004 X3 3.0, 6MT, Black Sapphire on Terracotta, port, Premium, Cold Weather.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-30-2015, 11:10 AM
Ricky Bobby's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 9,344
Ricky Bobby will become famous soon enough
^Glad you chimed in Ryan - yeah I remember you saying the power really got uncorked with the headers. Again if you don't need emissions testing then they really are a great way to go. If you do have emissions you'll need to fit high flow cats and play with o2 spacers on the rear sensor in order to avoid a CEL light (or using a tune like the Euro 2 which is a DME update) - note that aftermarket tunes that code out the rear o2's like Active Autowerke to the best of my knowledge will not pass emissions because it won't pass readiness
__________________
2018 Ram 2500 6.7L Cummins 68RFE
19k miles -Bright White/Black - Big Horn Sport - Crew Cab Short Bed
2013 X5 35D (CEO's) - Born on 5/17/2013 -
82k miles - Alpine White/Cinnamon Brown/Premium Pkg, Sport Activity/Premium Pkg and Sound/20" Style 214/Running Boards

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-06-2016, 04:37 PM
dabenthusiast's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: morgan hill, California
Posts: 179
dabenthusiast is on a distinguished road
My experience

Had my headers on for about 3 months...
Power definitely can feel it and hear the engine now.
All threw redline it pulls hard.

And I have my setup only with k&n high flow with stock 3.0i back of the headers.

I am waiting to Shark it.
But how it is now it already increased the red line just with header install.
Before engine felt stressed if going around 4500 to 5k rpm.
Now I can recline and engine really puts the power down.

Strange thing for me is I'm getting precat o2 cel.
Bank 2 sensor 1 and I'm running the 02 90° spacers
__________________
2001 e53 5mt
Stainless steel headers
UUC short shifter
Lowered on bc racing coilovers
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-06-2016, 04:50 PM
Ricky Bobby's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 9,344
Ricky Bobby will become famous soon enough
Run the 90 degree spacer on the post o2 sensor only - the pre-cat o2 sensor should be installed right into the bung on the header.

This way the ECU sees the "difference" between the o2 sensors, there is a cleaner reading at the rear, the CEL should go away after a few drive cycles once you do that.
__________________
2018 Ram 2500 6.7L Cummins 68RFE
19k miles -Bright White/Black - Big Horn Sport - Crew Cab Short Bed
2013 X5 35D (CEO's) - Born on 5/17/2013 -
82k miles - Alpine White/Cinnamon Brown/Premium Pkg, Sport Activity/Premium Pkg and Sound/20" Style 214/Running Boards

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-06-2016, 04:50 PM
tecboy99's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 187
tecboy99 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Dragon View Post
Hello my fellow e53 brothers. It's been a while. Having installed headers on my 3.0, however anecdotal, the old butt dyno felt quite a difference in performance and the sound is just shaweeeeet. The stock exhaust manifold with integrated cats is not optimal for performance. Bmw crammed the cats up high and close to the heat as possible to get them up to temp faster, to help make the m54 ULEV. I've posted picsl/vids in my other threads. They're quite compromised. I've also ran with open headers for a few days. There seems to be a loss of torque down low, but mid range and top end was awesome. Once I hooked the rest of the exhaust up, it was better down low and pulled much harder all the way to red line.

Just a note. I had shark injector software w/ the 7 k red line, modified exhaust with oem center muffler/resonator in place, and rear muffs replaced with some magna flow resnators welded in.

My X gets inspected this week, and then my headers are being installed soon on my current e53. I was going to do it over the summer, but I wanted some time to sort out aftermarket cats and Euro 2 software tune to delete out the post O2's.
Sounds sweet! I just got my 4.8is exhaust on today. It sounds awesome. My headers are coming shortly. What type of aftermarket cats are you looking at? and where would you put them? delete the resonator?
__________________
2004 X5 3.0 6 Speed MT
Build Date - 09/03
156K Alpine White / Black
Premium & Cold Weather Packs, Nav,
Tons of lighting mods, 4.8is Exhaust, Headers, Eibach Springs, OEM 87's, Custom DME Tune, OEM Hitch.

2005 X3 3.0i - 100K - Blue water Metallic / Black

2005 X5 3.0i - 140K - Alpine White / Hellbeige 2

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-06-2016, 06:07 PM
dabenthusiast's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: morgan hill, California
Posts: 179
dabenthusiast is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky Bobby View Post
Run the 90 degree spacer on the post o2 sensor only - the pre-cat o2 sensor should be installed right into the bung on the header.

This way the ECU sees the "difference" between the o2 sensors, there is a cleaner reading at the rear, the CEL should go away after a few drive cycles once you do that.

sorry i was little unclear, i only have 90 degree on post. and the pre cat is straight in the header.
p0420 code.
i cleaned mass air flow sensor and o2 sensors are fairly new. maybe they are the bosch ones.
iv heard that bosch might not work with the spacers..
__________________
2001 e53 5mt
Stainless steel headers
UUC short shifter
Lowered on bc racing coilovers
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-06-2016, 06:08 PM
tecboy99's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 187
tecboy99 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabenthusiast View Post
sorry i was little unclear, i only have 90 degree on post. and the pre cat is straight in the header.
p0420 code.
i cleaned mass air flow sensor and o2 sensors are fairly new. maybe they are the bosch ones.
iv heard that bosch might not work with the spacers..
You should do a euro 2 tune Then you can delete the Secondary air pump and have no CEL.
__________________
2004 X5 3.0 6 Speed MT
Build Date - 09/03
156K Alpine White / Black
Premium & Cold Weather Packs, Nav,
Tons of lighting mods, 4.8is Exhaust, Headers, Eibach Springs, OEM 87's, Custom DME Tune, OEM Hitch.

2005 X3 3.0i - 100K - Blue water Metallic / Black

2005 X5 3.0i - 140K - Alpine White / Hellbeige 2

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.