|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
There were no Carfax reported accidents, the truck was taken care of relatively well until it seems about 80-90k miles as it had some sort of CPO contract and got some things replaced under that but unrelated to the suspension. To be clear it's quite a multi part problem the inside of the rear passenger tire only runs on the inner chassis wheel liner, and the spring itself that was added for the coilvoer conversion rubs on the outer part of the chassis right where it begins to go up by the mount Is it possible I need new subframe bushings and that the frame could have shifted over, is that common? Or can really badly worn rear control arms cause stock tire rubbing on the inside of the wheel well? Would this also cause the spring to rub on the chassis or could that just be a case of installation error? I can't imagine it to be that hard to position the spring on the perch correctly and what not though, although the most recent owner has surprised me many times with their hackjobs on the rest of the truck. In addition to converting back to OEM rear air suspension I'm planning to replace the rear shocks, shock mounts, and add adjustable upper and lower control arms for rear toe and camber adjustments. Will this be enough to solve my awful rear tire wear and rear end rubbing noises? |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There rear tire wear is almost always from the ball joint on the wishbone link being worn. You can have 3° of neg camber without wearing the tire it's the negative toe while braking that causes the wear.
There was a recent thread where somebody that added adjustable links had rubbing like you described and figured out a fix. Factory links will not rub with any of the factory size tire options. Also: unless there is some damage you will be able to get the car adjusted to spec without special arms unless you lowered your car it's the only time I'm aware of where the special arms are needed. I've never seen an example of "can't get to spec" and "too much neg camber" that was inaccurately blamed on inside tire wear that wasn't either the wishbone link or the rear ball joint or both. If the wishbone link is shot, it can be possible to still align the suspension when not moving but when you hit the brakes the loading of the suspension will steer the wheels outward add much as 2° and eat through tires very quickly. When I replaced mine, I could move both the bad joints over 1.5mm that equates to well over 1° of steering motion! I can't remember the exact trick the guy used to fix the rub but I would cross that bridge if it comes up. It should cure itself as you swap back to factory parts.
__________________
2011 E70 N55 (me) 2012 E70 N63 (wife) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Virtually everything in the rear suspension is going to be trash after 80k.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mine lasted well over doubl that. Highway miles cause very little wear on suspension parts so there is no direct correlation between end of life and odometer.
Every year or so it's good to take the pressure off the springs and push all the ball joints around to see what is worn. You can't tell when the spring is pre loading the joints.
__________________
2011 E70 N55 (me) 2012 E70 N63 (wife) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1^
On 4.6 and 4.8is applications the torque of wide open throttle will wear out rear suspension parts at a higher rate than any 3.0 application. Uppers are long gone at 80-K. Ball joints might as well get replaced as they are simple and removes any worries. Look for any premature wear on the lower suspension arm inner bushings coming from owner/road abuse. Making a big fat BMW handle comes at a cost of replacement parts. Take a ruler and confirm that your rear subframe is centered. Replace everything suspect and you will have lots of driving enjoyment.
__________________
2005 X5 4.8IS The Blue ones are always FASTER.... Current Garage: 2005 X5 4.8is 2002 M5 TiSilver 2003 525iT 1998 528i Former Garage Stable Highlights 2004 325XiT Sport 1973 De Tomaso Pantera, L Model 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 4 sp Alpine White 1970 Dodge Challenger T/A 4 sp GoManGo Green 1971 Dart Sport, Dart Light package 1969 Road Runner 383 1968 Ply Barracuda 340S FB Sea-foam Green |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very valid point on the bigger motor and like I said largely based on how many highway miles. WOT wear is 1000s of times harsher than expansion joints and curves.
__________________
2011 E70 N55 (me) 2012 E70 N63 (wife) |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've never encountered an E53 with over 100k on it that didn't need close to a 100% suspension rebuild. IMO, the bushings and balljoints were very much underspecced for the job.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Both of ours were very gently driven before we bought them.
Fronts lasted about 140-150 rears lasted about 160-180.
__________________
2011 E70 N55 (me) 2012 E70 N63 (wife) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
My experience is that in typical use, the tension strut bushings in the front end are good for more like 30-50k.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
That was the first to fail on both or cars. Both made It over 130,000.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
2011 E70 N55 (me) 2012 E70 N63 (wife) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|