|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
PREVIOUS 2006 E53 X5 3.0D 2004 E53 X5 4.8is 2004 E53 X5 4.4 Sport 2011 E70 X5 3.0D with Aero kit 2009 E71 X6 50i Sport 2009 E70 X5 50i Sport 2007 E60 540 M Sport LCI (All time favourite car) 2007 E70 X5 4.8i Sport 2005 E53 4.8is 2003 E53 3.0 Sport |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
in the US we use R+M divided by 2
87,89 and 91 octane using this method. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Octane isnt measured the same around the world. Dont ask me how
but US 91 is similar to uk 95, etc
__________________
2003 4.6iS 2006 535d M-Sport Individual |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Paomien: Pretty good summary.
In short, the research method will always yield higher numbers than the motor method. (R>M, but it is not a linear or fixed relationship in any way What the US and Canada use is called Pump Octane, or Anti-Knock Index, and as was noted above, it is (R+M)/2. From a 98 RON, you can expect 5 to 6 points different to get to the pump octane, so that is like 92 - 93 pump octane. Again, it isn't a linear, fixed conversion, because a fuel that reacts one way in a test can react differently in the other test. Still, it is a good rule of thumb at the octane ratings under discussion. 89 pump octane is, similarly, very similar to 95 RON in Europe and Australia. The article made another very good point, which is that different fuel blends will perform differently in various real-world engines, despite having the same octane rating. That is why the "89 is crap" and "I can use 87 just fine" discussions have to be qualified with "from my supplier, in my geographic region" to be valid. For example, 89 works fine for me, no loss of power or mileage, but that doesn't mean it is true for anyone else. (but it might be true if they live near to Vancouver, have a 3.0, and drive similarly to me) BMW recommends 91 octane, which is a good way of covering all the variables in local refining and distribution systems. Sometimes it won't be sufficient. Sometimes it is more fuel ($$, and anti-knock index) than you require. Safest approach is to just use 91 in North America, and 98 elsewhere. Or, experiment and see what happens. My experience is not necessarily what yours will be. Now, has anyone else ever run one of those single-cylinder Waukesha engines and calculated a test lab octane rating? It was a university course in mechanical engineering, years ago. Good fun. Jeff
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue Last edited by JCL; 07-25-2006 at 05:04 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|