|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
2005 X5 4.4 (Sterling on Truffle) w/sport everything 2011 Audi S4 (Prestige, DSG) 2012 Audi Q7 (Sport, S-Line) |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
I avg. the equivalent of 27 mpg in my '06 3.0d fittet with a power ("tunit") kit, have more torque on tap than a 4.8is, available through a fun-as-hell mannual tranny, driving a daily mixture of steep hill climbs and fast sweeping highway (not exactly driving slow either..) :p
__________________
"Never Confuse a Legacy Improvement with a Vision of the Future" |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, 89 - and it does well. They recommend 89 for all except M cars and supercharged Minis. Both our cars do well, as did my '05 3.0 before I totaled it. When at high altitude in Colorado, or in the midwest, where ALL the gas has ethanol added, I used 91. But back here on the "flats", it's 89 all the way.
Here in the Buffalo, NY area, 91 is 12 to 15 cents more per gallon than 89, so it can make a diff. Right now, 89 is 2.53/gal.
__________________
Sageriders 2011 328, Water [blue], Saddle 2006 X5 4.4i, Sterling Grey/Truffle, Premium, Sport, Cold, Rear, Adj. Ride Ht. 2005 X5 3.0, Sterling Grey/Black, Sport(Totalled!) 2002 330i, Grey-Green Met/Truffle Br. [Sold] |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Good info on this here: http://www.chevron.com/products/prod...i_octane.shtml Unfortunately, engines also build less HP due to the lower barometric pressure... At 3700 feet elevation here in Calgary, the 4.4l V8 in my X5 which should make 315 HP will make closer to 280 HP BHP loss calculator here: http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php
__________________
2005 X5 4.4 (Sterling on Truffle) w/sport everything 2011 Audi S4 (Prestige, DSG) 2012 Audi Q7 (Sport, S-Line) |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
18.3 for 40,000 miles.
__________________
________________ 2003 X5 4.6is |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
'90 E30 M3 '05 X5/3.0 Sport (E53) '03 540i/6 M-Sport (E39) '91 325i/5 Sport Package (E30) BMWCCA #360858 SCCA# 374179 |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
01 3.0L Manual, if I try hard I can get the MPG to stay at 18.3 ... if I drive "normal" then it hovers at the high end of 17.
|
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
has anyone noticed a drop in mileage when changing from the non sport 17 inch wheels and tires to the wider heavier 19' staggered wheel sets? I haven't had mine long enough to really calculate any regular mileage and I'm switching wheels and tires this weekend.
|
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
With my 3.0i I get about 13-15 mpg in the city. It sucks but I could be more easy on the pedal but the X makes it hard to keep it under 4500 rpm...
__________________
Dear Mr. F-150, I may only have 225 hp but I sure owned you back when it snowed. Regards, X5 3.0i Bellevue, WA p.s. with Toyo Proxy s/t's on |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|