Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E53) Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2009, 10:29 AM
Weasel's Avatar
Almost never on here anymore :(
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 6,891
Weasel will become famous soon enough
The wheel sare all tied together through the drivetrain, all pushed at equal speeds by the engine. The bigger diameter of a tire, the further it rolls per one rotation. If one set of tires are bigger than the other, the bigger set will push the smaller set and the smaller set will drag the bigger set... putting LOTS of stress on the drivetrain.

The tire sizes work probably different than you think. The 1st # is the tread width in millimeters, the 2nd # is the aspect ratio and works off of a percentage of the treadwidth... so a 275/40 is different height from a 295/40 and so on. The 275/40 and 315/35 are at the same rolling diameter which is why they are the best tire size option.

If you go on a site like tirerack.com and click "specs" when looking at a tire, it will give you the overall diameter and revs per mile for each tire size. Here's some to look at.

Dunlop did their homework to make tires the same size: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...e1=yes&place=0

Yet look at the different #s on the yokos:http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...e1=yes&place=0
__________________
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all" (Bender, futurama)

You make something idiotproof, they'll make a better idiot


You think professional is expensive, just wait until you pay for amateur.

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

X5 pics

RIP 4.6is.....

2003 4.6is
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2009, 11:31 AM
RichiRich's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,531
RichiRich is on a distinguished road
OH YEAH! i went with the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

OEM sizes of 275/40/20 front, 315/35/20 rear.....

Just recentley lowered with KW coilovers.....car handles great.....even in the ice and snow...carefully of course.





RR
__________________
Richirich
***YOUR FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD MODJUNKY MAN***
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2009, 12:13 PM
TaMbALoLoNg's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camp Pendleton
Posts: 1,273
TaMbALoLoNg is an unknown quantity at this point
Smile

[quote=weasel56]The wheel sare all tied together through the drivetrain, all pushed at equal speeds by the engine. The bigger diameter of a tire, the further it rolls per one rotation. If one set of tires are bigger than the other, the bigger set will push the smaller set and the smaller set will drag the bigger set... putting LOTS of stress on the drivetrain.

The tire sizes work probably different than you think. The 1st # is the tread width in millimeters, the 2nd # is the aspect ratio and works off of a percentage of the treadwidth... so a 275/40 is different height from a 295/40 and so on. The 275/40 and 315/35 are at the same rolling diameter which is why they are the best tire size option.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree pretty much 100%, but the difference between 275/40 and 295/40 is only 8mm, which is practically nothing and you can pretty much balance it out if you have less PSI on your rear tires. It shouldn't put significant amt of stress on the drivetrain worth worrying about.
__________________
..................
The Marines already have a few good men
...............The Navy CORPSMAN
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2009, 01:41 PM
rayxi's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 4,171
rayxi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaMbALoLoNg
I agree pretty much 100%, but the difference between 275/40 and 295/40 is only 8mm, which is practically nothing and you can pretty much balance it out if you have less PSI on your rear tires. It shouldn't put significant amt of stress on the drivetrain worth worrying about.
I don't know how you're doing your math but the difference in circumference is around 100 mm and the difference in diameter is 32 mm. That's a 4% difference in rolling diameter which is outside the recommended maximum difference of 3%.

There are other considerations besides drivetrain stress. DSC and ABS both rely on sensing rotational differences between tires. It's possible that introducing differences under normal driving conditions could throw those systems off.
__________________
Wake up every day that would be a start.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2009, 05:33 PM
TwinsPoppa's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 3,523
TwinsPoppa is on a distinguished road
Listen to weasel and go with the stock size tires.

I used the following sizes because my wheels are smaller width than stock:

265/45-20 (front)
295/40-20 (rear)

If you're going to use different width tires, in general, remember that your aspect ratios will be different to match the rolling diameters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2009, 05:54 PM
motordavid's Avatar
RetiredBum & Semi-RenaissanceMan
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mtns of Western NC, & SW FLA
Posts: 16,829
motordavid will become famous soon enoughmotordavid will become famous soon enough
richirich,
Titz looking wheels and tires!
Especially like the look on your Ti Ag...
Wish I could justify a set for ours.
BR,mD

__________________
Ol'UncleMotor
From the Home Base of Pro Bono Punditry
and 50 Cent Opins...

Our Mtn Scenes, Car Pics, and Road Trip Pics on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627297418250/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627332480833/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/45275375@N00/

My X Page




Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2009, 07:16 PM
RichiRich's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,531
RichiRich is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by motordavid
richirich,
Titz looking wheels and tires!
Especially like the look on your Ti Ag...
Wish I could justify a set for ours.
BR,mD

MD - Thank you for the comp!

LOL! I had to justify mine to the MRS. LOL!

Rich
__________________
Richirich
***YOUR FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD MODJUNKY MAN***
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2009, 12:12 AM
TwinsPoppa's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 3,523
TwinsPoppa is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by motordavid
richirich,
Titz looking wheels and tires!
Especially like the look on your Ti Ag...
Wish I could justify a set for ours.
BR,mD
Hahaha ... you know what they say (and it's usually what I do) ... it's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission!

Shhh ... don't tell my wife!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2009, 06:54 PM
Weasel's Avatar
Almost never on here anymore :(
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 6,891
Weasel will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaMbALoLoNg
I agree pretty much 100%, but the difference between 275/40 and 295/40 is only 8mm, which is practically nothing and you can pretty much balance it out if you have less PSI on your rear tires. It shouldn't put significant amt of stress on the drivetrain worth worrying about.
The difference between 275/40 and 295/40 equals out to 18 full rotations per mile!!! I have personally seen and had to fix the problems created by this, namely... transfer case. In 2000 - 2003 X5s it usually strips the splines at the front output shaft of the case costing you a front driveshaft and a transfer case. In 2004 - 2006 X5s it causes substantial wear to the clutches in the case where it transfers torque split to the front wheels, causing once again the transfer case to need replacement.

It would be like having different gear ratios front and rear of your 4 wheel drive... you just don't do that.
__________________
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all" (Bender, futurama)

You make something idiotproof, they'll make a better idiot


You think professional is expensive, just wait until you pay for amateur.

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

X5 pics

RIP 4.6is.....

2003 4.6is
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2009, 02:21 AM
TaMbALoLoNg's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Camp Pendleton
Posts: 1,273
TaMbALoLoNg is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by weasel56
The difference between 275/40 and 295/40 equals out to 18 full rotations per mile!!! I have personally seen and had to fix the problems created by this, namely... transfer case. In 2000 - 2003 X5s it usually strips the splines at the front output shaft of the case costing you a front driveshaft and a transfer case. In 2004 - 2006 X5s it causes substantial wear to the clutches in the case where it transfers torque split to the front wheels, causing once again the transfer case to need replacement.

It would be like having different gear ratios front and rear of your 4 wheel drive... you just don't do that.
Makes perfect sense. The above is my current set up but I'm going to replace my rears to match my 275 fronts, I certaintly dont want future transfercase problems. So far I dont notice any problems right now and my X runs great. So i guess its either 275 or 295 all around. What do you think? This have been a very informative thread..great job guys
__________________
..................
The Marines already have a few good men
...............The Navy CORPSMAN
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.