Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E53) Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2012, 02:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 57
dm567 is on a distinguished road
transmission on 2003 vers 2004 x5's

Can someone tell me if they changed the transmission in 2004 for the bmw x5. What was the transmission before and after?

My mechanic may of mentioned to me that the 2003 and older transmission was older and prone to failure. Is that true?

and what about the replacement transmission in the 2004? Will that one last?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 07-01-2012, 04:12 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,755
SlickGT1 is on a distinguished road
Might be true, but I don't think so. Ive seen all the years fail on these forums and can't say one is any stronger.
__________________
2006 4.8is, Black on White. SOLD Sniff Sniff.

2017 F85 x5m, Black on Red. BEAST MODE


"The older we grow the greater becomes our wonder at how much ignorance one can contain without bursting one's clothes." - Mark Twain

Unlock OBC post 5
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2012, 12:15 AM
jdd jdd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 72
jdd is on a distinguished road
Pre 2004 X5's had the GM 5 speed transmission, 2004 onward E53 had the ZF 6 speed, unless you're one of the lucky ones who has a manual trans.
Both are prone to different failures, but overall it appears the ZF ones have less issues, although they are generally more expensive to repair.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:13 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 389
GOFAST GUY is on a distinguished road
From what I've been told, my 03 4.6is has a ZF transmission and it has to go under the knife before winter comes.
__________________
If you can still see the disapointment on his face in your rear view mirror, he's not far enough behind.
98 M3 Sedan blk/blk Sold
00 BMW 540i Sold
03 BMW 4.6IS
98 BMW E36 M3 modified
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2012, 11:39 AM
TwinTurboGTR's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Monmouth County, Nj
Posts: 1,718
TwinTurboGTR is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdd View Post
Pre 2004 X5's had the GM 5 speed transmission, 2004 onward E53 had the ZF 6 speed, unless you're one of the lucky ones who has a manual trans.
Both are prone to different failures, but overall it appears the ZF ones have less issues, although they are generally more expensive to repair.
pre-facelifted E53 were equipped with 2 different tranny manufacturers. The 3.0i came with a 5 speed GM tranny while the 4.4/4.6's were equipped with a 5 speed from ZF. The entire model line up did not have a 5 speed from GM set up. Only on the 3.0.

But to answer the real question, There is no correlation between which tranny goes first or which one is more prone to failure.

The only thing I can think of is this. Now more and more manufactures are making it harder for the DIY'r to work on his/her machine. Some are going so far as to remove the Engine oil dipstick. Now they do this because there are some DIY'rs that go rogue and put in anything they want and are ignorant to what their rides need. Manufactures were probably sick and tired of doing warranty work because of rogue DIY'rs. So they eliminated the Dummy Stick and put in a sensor and MADE you take it into a dealer to have them do it.

Now from being around on this forum for years, I have never come across a post that was titled "Low trans fluid level" message. I have only seen "Trans fail safe". Most of the post I see regarding trans fluid is because a poster will come on and say, "Thrans is slipping, roaring, bucking..." By the time they crack the pan open, the trans is toast because the fluid level was too low. So what I am thinking is, the reason why the trannys may fail, in most case atleast is because maybe the gasket on the tranny pan has give way. It starts as a slow drip and one may not notice or may think, "Oil from the OSV." As time goes on the leak may get worse. As this time goes on the fluid level is getting lower and lower until "BANG" you get some slipping and it is too late.

This is just my opinion. Is this why most tranny's fail, I don't know. But if you take away too much fluid and the clutch packs have nothing to use, then yeah, my theory makes sense. But if the tranny was just neglected all the time, then that would fry a tranny too.
__________________
2011 E70 50i M Sport


Exterior: Alpine Weiss III Interior: Nevada

PACKAGES: .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2012, 08:49 PM
JCL's Avatar
JCL JCL is offline
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,853
JCL will become famous soon enoughJCL will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dm567 View Post
Can someone tell me if they changed the transmission in 2004 for the bmw x5. What was the transmission before and after?

My mechanic may of mentioned to me that the 2003 and older transmission was older and prone to failure. Is that true?

and what about the replacement transmission in the 2004? Will that one last?
Five speed up to 2003, six speed from 2004 onwards.

GM on the 3.0, ZF on the V8 models (and some diesels)

No difference in likelihood of failure IMO, but older models naturally have higher mileage so more have failed.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White

Retired:
2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey
2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver

2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey
2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:22 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 57
dm567 is on a distinguished road
Has anyone heard of a zf transmission going 200K? a mechanic told me I have a 1 in four chance of getting to 150K with the zf. Does that sound right?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mirabel
Posts: 419
Turbo_Bimmer is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwinTurboGTR View Post
pre-facelifted E53 were equipped with 2 different tranny manufacturers. The 3.0i came with a 5 speed GM tranny while the 4.4/4.6's were equipped with a 5 speed from ZF. The entire model line up did not have a 5 speed from GM set up. Only on the 3.0.

But to answer the real question, There is no correlation between which tranny goes first or which one is more prone to failure.

The only thing I can think of is this. Now more and more manufactures are making it harder for the DIY'r to work on his/her machine. Some are going so far as to remove the Engine oil dipstick. Now they do this because there are some DIY'rs that go rogue and put in anything they want and are ignorant to what their rides need. Manufactures were probably sick and tired of doing warranty work because of rogue DIY'rs. So they eliminated the Dummy Stick and put in a sensor and MADE you take it into a dealer to have them do it.

Now from being around on this forum for years, I have never come across a post that was titled "Low trans fluid level" message. I have only seen "Trans fail safe". Most of the post I see regarding trans fluid is because a poster will come on and say, "Thrans is slipping, roaring, bucking..." By the time they crack the pan open, the trans is toast because the fluid level was too low. So what I am thinking is, the reason why the trannys may fail, in most case atleast is because maybe the gasket on the tranny pan has give way. It starts as a slow drip and one may not notice or may think, "Oil from the OSV." As time goes on the leak may get worse. As this time goes on the fluid level is getting lower and lower until "BANG" you get some slipping and it is too late.

This is just my opinion. Is this why most tranny's fail, I don't know. But if you take away too much fluid and the clutch packs have nothing to use, then yeah, my theory makes sense. But if the tranny was just neglected all the time, then that would fry a tranny too.
Also, on the ZF 6 spd, another possible cause of fluid leakage is the sealing sleeve.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2012, 12:26 AM
rogerkiu's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,062
rogerkiu is on a distinguished road
For all 3.0 engines including pre-facelift and facelift models, only GM made 5-speed automatic gearbox used. For all 4.4i, 4.6is and 4.8is, all equipped with ZF made 5-speed (pre-facelifted) or 6-speed (facelifted) gearbox used.
__________________
--2004 E53 X5 4.8is - ECE version; right hand drive; Located in Hong Kong; ext. black sapphire metallic; int. leather black; adaptive dynamic bi-xenon headlights; 16:9 onboard monitor w/o navigation; 20" genuine BMW Y-spoke 214 wheels with Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport tires; Int. rear view mirror w/ compass.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.