|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Depending on what engine you have you may lose or gain some economy with the lower engine RPM at 80, especially when towing. While slight you will be in a different place in the engine 'power band.'
__________________
Dallas |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
bcredliner - I'm not too concerned about the engine power band. The 3.0 has plenty of power for me and I'm not trying to win any races. I rarely tow my load over 65 mph.
At this point, I'm more concerned with differential revs per mile front drive to rear drive and any affect on my Mechanical (Non-Xdrive) transfer case. Searching this site, online, youtube videos, my owner's and Bentley manuals, . . . I can't find a detailed explanation of the transfer case's ability (or inability) to mechanically adapt to differential front and rear axle rpms. I figure that it must be able to . . . otherwise anything that throws front to rear tire diameters out of sink (tire pressures, hvy rear load, hvy front load, . . . perhaps even as experienced during heavy braking) would cause a binding stress that would greatly reduce mpgs, or worse, strip TC gears. If this is this the case, tire pressures and absolutely even tire wear are critical. So, what am I missing? What is the component in the drive train that allows for different front and rear drive axle rpms? If this component only allows for a "slight" differential in the rpms, what is the tolerance, and how would it most likely fail if the tolerances were exceeded?
__________________
'65 Ford Mustang Fastback 4spd Memories '77 Porsche 911 Targa 5spd Memories '93 BMW 525iT Memories '98 BMW 325i 5spd Memories '01 BMW X5 3.0i 5spd Making Memories |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|