|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 1. Some owners follow the rule "wait until it breaks" and fix accordingly based on their budget (OE, OEM or aftermarket) 2. Some owners like to be proactive based on trending, copy what others have done or create their own plan for executing preventive maintenance 3. Some owners are OCD with regular maintenance and preventive maintenance 4. Some owners does not care, both regular maintenance and preventive maintenance I am in between 2 and 3 Good luck to the OP!
__________________
Build Date: 06/2004 2004 E53 3.0L 6 Cyl Engine Code: M54 AT: 5L40-E/GM5 (A5S 390R) http://s101.photobucket.com/user/lho...in/library/E53 2004 E46 M3 Coupe 3.2L 6 Cyl Engine Code: S54 MT: S6S 420G - 6 speed http://s101.photobucket.com/user/lho...in/library/E46 ---------------------------------- Build Date: 10/2008 2009 E90N 328xi Sedan 6 Cyl Engine code: N51 AT: GA6L45R/GM6 http://s101.photobucket.com/user/lho...in/library/E90 |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think you may have inadvertently flipped the pre & post facelift types of alternators around...so just for the sake of clarification for those that may not know...the breakdown of alternators vs e53 engines are:
__________________
Become a BMW CCA member! Click HERE to join and feel free to use my BMW CCA member #191509 as a referral.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That is not math. That is a supposition which means it could be true as well as false. It is a supposition of an imaginary horrible. Here's another supposition---inspected the components of the cooling system. Belt was bad. Replaced belt $25.00 vs. $400 to $600 for overhaul. Saved as much as $575 by replacing the belt only and I never blew a head gasket because I look at the garage floor when I back out, I check my gauges when I drive, the coolant level when I get gas and listen for noises that shouldn't be there. I have acknowledged your opinion but it is only an opinion. I even acknowledged it is best practice. I have a different opinion-Just because one only replaces the part that has failed does not mean one is foolish or will suffer terrible consequences.
__________________
Dallas |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't blame you, you own a V8, which has its own issues. But the cooling system in the I6 is the Achilles heel. I understand your point: replace only the bad part. In a way I am the same replacing ONLY the bad part but as I mentioned, the cooling system is the exception. They fail like clockwork. So your advice of replacing only the bad part is the correct advice from a technical standpoint but it is false economy on the practical standpoint.
__________________
1998 E39 528i 5sp MT 2006 E53 X5 3.0 6sp MT |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Replacing whichever parts are generally involved in failure is plain common sense.
CN90 - your example of the cooling system systemic issue on the E39 is an excellent one. Where parts within a system are known to fail, only a sub0standard technician would replace only the failed part in that system. The reason being, they are generally asked to warrant their work, and how can that occur when they know there are other failure-prone elements they have not at the least inspected, at best replaced. Do it once, do it right. To misquote an old adage - a rich man fixes something once. A poor man fixes something many times.
__________________
Cheers, Anthony |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As you know, techs replace only what is authorized by the owner. I think you can say a good tech should/would advise one of the risk (significantly less than a certainty) of doing less than an overhaul. There probably a tech or two somewhere that wouldn't take the work unless they did the overhaul. I don't know of him. Yes, they stand by their work which means if they didn't do the work they don't stand by it. From my point of view the following would be appropriate : I feel strongly that the cooling system should be overhauled every X miles or X years. That is because the cooling system failures can cause very expensive engine problems that I have seen occur when the system is not overhauled. While the cooling system components can have very different life cycles it is not unusual that they fail near the same time, especially if the vehicle has overheated. There are those that successfully replace components as they fail. That is a higher risk scenario but a direction you might want to consider. If you choose to do so be sure you understand how and how often to inspect the cooling system so you are more likely to recognize a problem before it happens. In cases, such as a bad water pump, several other cooling system components will be at least partially removed or accessible. That being the case it will be more economical in the longer run to replace those parts as well. I'm done.
__________________
Dallas |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Although I am an advocate for cooling overhaul, there are situations when a piece-meal approach is fine too, when it meets the following conditions:
1. The owner is on a very tight budget. 2. The owner is very careful and open the hood once a week to check the cooling system because this is a high-mileage vehicle. 3. The owner does not drive long-distance trips out of town. 4. The owner is mechanically and can tackle this job again and again. The only downside is every time the cooling system is opened, you lose coolant, which is about $12/gallon for Prestone, not a bad price. Or you can recuperate the coolant and re-use it (I use coffee filter paper to filter it when I re-use coolant). 5. So let's say the only wrong is the WP. Fine, replace only the WP. Check all other stuff (belts, rollers, tensioners, fan clutch, fan blade), if they seem fine, re-use them. The rollers bearing can be re-packed with grease for minimal cost of grease. I wrote the DIY (re-greasing roller) in bimmerfest E39 forum. 6. The tstat is hard to test while in the vehicle. So every time the WP is replaced, the tstat should be replaced too for 2 reasons: a. At 100K, the tstat is unreliable and can lock up any time. b. The tstat housing is plastic and can blow any time. 7. The reservoir is the same, it is plastic and typically burst at 130K or so. So for a vehcile > 130K, the basic basic bare-bone mimimum is: - WP (HEPU is $60 at eeuroparts.com) - Tstat (Wahler is $60) - Reservoir ($90 at dealer, do not use any other brand) I mentioned the brand name because this is the best bang for the buck.
__________________
1998 E39 528i 5sp MT 2006 E53 X5 3.0 6sp MT |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dallas |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Am I the oddball in the bunch since I've got over 260,000 miles on the original water pump with no indication of any engine cooling issues?
2002 X5 3.0 260,590 miles 2004 325i 115,000 miles |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay, I need your guys help again!
The tools finally came in to take the fan out. I was able to put the serpentine belt back on... and I found the leak under the engine. What do you guys think is causing the leak? Leak Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugx34Tnsej8 Leak Part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbXlyXqC5Us Also the pulley that spins the fan is really loose, is there a way I can tighten it?
__________________
2002 X5 3.0i |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|