Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E70) Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2016, 12:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Bad Mileage 4.8i Sport Wheels. PSI Problem?

I just purchased a set of the 214 style 20" wheels for my 4.8i e70. Previously, I was averaging 15mpg in the city and 19mpg on the highway. I pressurized them to 37 rear, and 36 front, and am seeing a 5mpg reduction, so now average about 10mpg city and 14mpg highway.

Is pressure to blame for this huge reduction in mileage, or is it just the wheels? EPA spec with them is supposed to be 14/17, so I thought I would end up somewhere pretty close to there. I don't drive with a lead foot, and it's still pretty bad.

Can someone tell me what they usually inflate theirs to, and what your mileage with the 214 style sport rims usually averages?

Thanks a ton
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 05-18-2016, 03:18 PM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Judging what others get from their diesels, mine is loosing 2-3 mpg from the 214 wheels, so your results may be correct. I have mine inflated to 32F/34R when not towing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2016, 04:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawareca View Post
Judging what others get from their diesels, mine is loosing 2-3 mpg from the 214 wheels, so your results may be correct. I have mine inflated to 32F/34R when not towing.

That's really interesting. How does the tire wear come out with those readings? I've read stories of people only getting 14k miles with their 214's and I'm also hoping to avoid that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2016, 08:25 PM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Yeah, this is what i got from my rear Bridgestones with camber set at lowest possible and moderate towing. Now I have Nittos and after 7-8 k miles there is no visible wear at all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2016, 12:24 AM
ard ard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sierra Foothills, California
Posts: 6,765
ard is on a distinguished road
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.

Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2016, 12:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 258
noelskii is on a distinguished road
Damn, that's no bueno! I've been thinking of pulling the trigger on those rims too...
__________________
2007 X5 3.0 Si
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2016, 08:29 AM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.
My results are not scientific, but I have seen people here report over 500 miles on a full tank. I was never able to get over 450 miles even with soft driving style. My mileage varies very little from city to hwy. Doing 80 on the hwy is where the roll resistance will have most impact so it makes sense.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...
My rear Bridgestone RFT weared-out in a heartbeat with minimum camber settings possible(~1.2 degree) and 0 toe. Fronts were wearing on the outside first , which has nothing to do with the toe. You are generally correct, but with these monstrous sizes and run-flat tires the wear factors are different.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2016, 01:01 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 46
Kostyan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by macmac80210 View Post
I just purchased a set of the 214 style 20" wheels for my 4.8i e70. Previously, I was averaging 15mpg in the city and 19mpg on the highway. I pressurized them to 37 rear, and 36 front, and am seeing a 5mpg reduction, so now average about 10mpg city and 14mpg highway.

Is pressure to blame for this huge reduction in mileage, or is it just the wheels? EPA spec with them is supposed to be 14/17, so I thought I would end up somewhere pretty close to there. I don't drive with a lead foot, and it's still pretty bad.

Can someone tell me what they usually inflate theirs to, and what your mileage with the 214 style sport rims usually averages?

Thanks a ton

is this observation over a single tankful or over a period of time? There are also ton of other factors, but mpg should not drop by 4mpg. I'd have your truck checked out.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2016, 05:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lake Forest, IL
Posts: 417
bmrboi2 is on a distinguished road
What kind of tires are you running. Cheapos Like Nitto, Hankook, Kumho are shit for mileage tires.
__________________
2010 X5 3.0 X-drive Titanium Silver/Black
2018 Ford F-150 Platinum Crew
2010 528xi (His)
2017 M2 Manual (His)

Former Headaches:
2008 X5 RIP
2015 M235
2013 135is
2009 535xi Wagon (JUNK)
2007 530xi 6spd CPO Sport (Best Damn Car EVER)
2011 335xi M-sport Coupe 6spd (Sex on Wheels)
2010 550GT "CPO" (Junk)
2012 X5 35d "CPO" (More Junk)
2004 330i ZHP Sedan
2002 325xi Wagon
2000 323i Sedan
1998 M3 Sedan
1992 325i Sedan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2016, 06:27 PM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmrboi2 View Post
Cheapos Like Nitto, Hankook, Kumho are shit for mileage tires.
Yeah, they are all the same, right BTW, Hankook are the sole tire supplier for the DTM, the German racing series closest to F1. And Nitto is manufacturing one of the best, long lasting and affordable amateur racing/track day enthusiast tire.
Tire is either sticky, has a good or excellent grip, and is bad for gas mileage because of the roll resistance. Or it is "plastic" and doesnt have much grip and therefore doesnt hurt the comsumption much. Think Michelin Pilot Sport vs Michelin Energy.
My current Nittos compared to the previous Bridgestone RFT's are:
-less than 50% of the price
-at 7k miles quieter than the Bridgestones at 15k miles(when they were replaced due to wear)
-judging by the wear will last at least 3 times more then the Bridgestones
-may have slightly less dry grip, but it is very hard to determine only by feeling
-have definitely less wet grip
Now the tire installers dont hate me when i show up with new tires

Last edited by bawareca; 05-19-2016 at 06:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.