|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bad Mileage 4.8i Sport Wheels. PSI Problem?
Is pressure to blame for this huge reduction in mileage, or is it just the wheels? EPA spec with them is supposed to be 14/17, so I thought I would end up somewhere pretty close to there. I don't drive with a lead foot, and it's still pretty bad. Can someone tell me what they usually inflate theirs to, and what your mileage with the 214 style sport rims usually averages? Thanks a ton |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Judging what others get from their diesels, mine is loosing 2-3 mpg from the 214 wheels, so your results may be correct. I have mine inflated to 32F/34R when not towing.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's really interesting. How does the tire wear come out with those readings? I've read stories of people only getting 14k miles with their 214's and I'm also hoping to avoid that. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, this is what i got from my rear Bridgestones with camber set at lowest possible and moderate towing. Now I have Nittos and after 7-8 k miles there is no visible wear at all.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.
Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Damn, that's no bueno! I've been thinking of pulling the trigger on those rims too...
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
, which has nothing to do with the toe. You are generally correct, but with these monstrous sizes and run-flat tires the wear factors are different.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
is this observation over a single tankful or over a period of time? There are also ton of other factors, but mpg should not drop by 4mpg. I'd have your truck checked out. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
What kind of tires are you running. Cheapos Like Nitto, Hankook, Kumho are shit for mileage tires.
__________________
2010 X5 3.0 X-drive Titanium Silver/Black 2018 Ford F-150 Platinum Crew 2010 528xi (His) 2017 M2 Manual (His) Former Headaches: 2008 X5 RIP 2015 M235 2013 135is 2009 535xi Wagon (JUNK) ![]() 2007 530xi 6spd CPO Sport (Best Damn Car EVER) 2011 335xi M-sport Coupe 6spd (Sex on Wheels) 2010 550GT "CPO" (Junk) ![]() 2012 X5 35d "CPO" (More Junk) ![]() 2004 330i ZHP Sedan 2002 325xi Wagon 2000 323i Sedan 1998 M3 Sedan 1992 325i Sedan |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, they are all the same, right
BTW, Hankook are the sole tire supplier for the DTM, the German racing series closest to F1. And Nitto is manufacturing one of the best, long lasting and affordable amateur racing/track day enthusiast tire.Tire is either sticky, has a good or excellent grip, and is bad for gas mileage because of the roll resistance. Or it is "plastic" and doesnt have much grip and therefore doesnt hurt the comsumption much. Think Michelin Pilot Sport vs Michelin Energy. My current Nittos compared to the previous Bridgestone RFT's are: -less than 50% of the price -at 7k miles quieter than the Bridgestones at 15k miles(when they were replaced due to wear) -judging by the wear will last at least 3 times more then the Bridgestones -may have slightly less dry grip, but it is very hard to determine only by feeling -have definitely less wet grip Now the tire installers dont hate me when i show up with new tires
Last edited by bawareca; 05-19-2016 at 06:40 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|